Tuesday, September 2, 2014

To be nude and to see God as nude is not a sin... but a chance. Dress and belief cover the truth and chance to know the truth

To be nude and to see God naked with naked eyes
Is not a sin... But a chance.

Dress and belief equally cover the truth 
And deny the chance 
To see and know naked truth as naked.


*******************


If you believe in God,
Believe in you, your body and its nudity.

You, your body and its nudity,
According to your best belief,
Is original creation and gift of God.

So, only if you disbelieve or doubt God,
You happen to doubt and disbelieve you,
Your body and its nudity.

Because you don’t believe God
As the one who has given you
Something that you think is good
And something that you can be proud of.


Hence, your disbelief of God is that
Which leads you naturally to deny and cover
The body and its nudity.

So, you happen to put the dress 
On the body and its nudity.

The same way you deny and cover
God and his truth with your dress of belief.

The same way you confine God
And his truth with your dress of belief.

*****************

To be nude means only to be real and original.

Dressing is a big lie and a false claim.

It is with the dress we teach our children
To lie, to make claim false,
And to be hypocrites and artificial throughout their life.

This is how the religions,
That deny true God, truth and reality
And, of sheer hypocrisy and pseudo morality start with.

The dresses we wear stand for nothing,
Except to increase number of criminals and psychotics.

The dresses artificially creates, gives, and injects in
The viewers a feel of, more beauty to the dresser,
Which really is not there in nudity.

It gives raise to certain criminal tendency, thereby,
Which won't be there otherwise.....

*******************

Nudity has nothing in it,
But ugliness or natural beauty, at the most.

Mostly people consider this natural beauty as ugliness.

Hence, dresses are put on to create more artificial beauty.

So, let the prophets of dresses and religions say
What are they standing with the dress for?

Is the dress put on to cover the beauty?

Or is it put on to increase or enhance the beauty?

Is the dress put on to cover the ugliness?

Or is it put on to create the ugliness?

They have to be clear.

The dresses creates in the viewers’ mind a feel
Of something special remaining hidden inside the dress.

This feel of having illusory something special inside
Creates the criminals and psychotics.
It creates the sexual perverts and rapists.

Nudity has nothing in it, but one’s real body.

Or if one is able to see the beauty in and with nudity,
They are those who are confident and mentally balanced.

Others, who needs to dress, 
Who can see their body only through dresses,
Have no courage and confidence about their body.

They can’t consider their body as their temple.

They have got a certain kind of inferiority complex
With regard to their body.
Hence they want to cover or to put dress on.

Just because of their fear and shyness.


************* 



If the dress is to enhance and increase,
And to respect the beauty, it is divine.
It is to enhance the divine purpose.
It is artistic and creative side of man.

But one should be clear it is to enhance
And it is not because of fear of nudity or one's own body.
And it should be with respecting other side's view too
If the others have the view that the beauty is otherwise.


**************


Nudity or dressing or modestly or moderately dressing - 
All are not to be imposed. 
All are truly to be kept optional for each one to choose, 
Without offending others at the minimum and the most. 
And it should be optional as a right and individual freedom. 

But, on one side, dressing, especially fully women, 
Is strictly imposed 
Without respecting the right of other side 
To be nude or modestly or moderately dressed. 

Especially in the case of women. 
Women are put in particular kind of feel of threat and fear 
About their nudity and modestly or moderately dressing.

And in that case Women are asked to consider themselves 
Only as a commodity of their men-partners.

No comments: