Monday, January 26, 2009

Pathetic

Man .
Pathetic.
Needs to command on others
But gets commanded.

Frightening;
Getting frightened.
Threatening;
Getting threatened.
His mere existence and identity
Ever under the falling rocks.

A room full of questions
And he alone in the room.

He seeks shelters
In philosophy, poetry
Power and fame.
His imagination and dreams.
He plays and wrestles
Only with the unreal
Without being able
Ever to touch the real.
He tries;
Gets tired.

Running inside,
He makes no start.
He wants to be
Useful and valuable.
And forgets to be
Useless and purposeless,
Thereby,
Living in no-spontaneity.

Just hollow.
He feels and touches the hollowness
At any time he is alone.
So is he eager to be social.
Engaged in any game of
Purposes and usefulness,
Business or jobs
Philosophy or power,
Poetry or fame.

His opposite.
Woman.
Purposelessly and uselessly
Normal and meditating,
Without any need to go
After business or job
Power or philosophy,
Poetry or Fame.

She touches
The real really.
Physically really.

Just because of the man
The spirit, , behind,
Unknown, unseen,
To sustain
Her physicality intact.

Thursday, January 15, 2009

Masculine sexuality doesn't worth even one marriage

Love?

What we call “love”,
In our day to day life,
Is not “love”.

It is relative part of love.

Love includes that too.
Love include both liking and disliking
It includes both enmity and friendship.
It includes both hate and mercy.

Love is to the whole.
Likes and dislikes are to the part.

Love is when you are
Detatched from part
But attached to the whole

Likes and dislikes are
When you are attached to part
But detached to the whole.

God loves himslef.
In the way he meditates on himself.
So, the creation of this whole universality.

Your love is to your self.
Bound to meditate on your self.
So comes your life and all your acts in its.
Your likes and dislikes from it.


We don't love any one and anything.
Only we like and dislike, for the reasons,
As part of our love for life,
As part of our love for God,
As part of our love for the self.



Reasons may get rusted
Whereby liking will become disliking
And disliking will become liking.

Loving one’s self is equal to loving life.
Loving life is equal to loving God.
All are one and the same.

Meditation.

Love for all these
Self or life or God
Are one and the same.
Done unconditionally.

Love is unconditional
And only when unconditional
Love becomes love.


So is it said
Love has no end,
No start,
No limit,
No face,
And no discrimination.
So is it blind.
Be it the love,
For life or self or God.



You are bound and made
To love life.
The self.
The whole
God.

As part of loving the whole,
The self or life or God,
You are made to like and dislike.

Dislike too, like liking,
Is love and part of love.

Hate and enmity
Are equally part of love
Like likes and friendships are.

What is done on a condition
Is not love.
It is liking, or disliking.

Relative.

Love is absolute and with absolute.

Liking and disliking will have its own
Reasons and conditions relative.

We like and dislike,
For the reasons that rust,
Due to our love for the whole.
For life or self or God.

Hence,
Love is divine,
unconditional.

Likes and dislikes
Are its earthly material form, children.
Applied in our day to day life.
Like we are children of
One one and only absolute.
God.
Whose oneness can't be
Even termed as one.

To sustain the physical self,
We only like or dislike,
Woman and all,
With a condition
And for certain reasons.
That is why
We shifts our likes and dislikes
As and when it rusts

Love has no condition
And it has no opposite.

****************

Does the dimensions and depth of
Masculine sexuality worth a marriage?

Not at all.
Not even one single marriage

Sexuality and sexual orgasmic depth of masculinity
Has nothing to do with the marriage
And it doesn't worth even one marriage.



And whatever he shows
Because of such sexuality
Is not what love is.

Masculine sexuality is shallow and hollow,
Which love can not be.

It has no depth and meaning
It is only his way and fate
Of trying and getting tired.

His sexual experience and orgasm
Have no depth and strength to justify
(atleast to the level and extend of a woman)
The burden and responsibility
He is made to take up for that.

It doesn't justify the cost/price of
Looking after his wife,
As his only sexual partner,
And its by-product,
Except for social binding.

His sexual drive is apparent and shallow,
Like an air filled balloon,
But not a simple needle is required
To make it into nothing.

And this his drive
Is nothing more than a trap by the nature
To cause distribution of seeds
As part of ensuring the continuity of his genus.
Nothing more than a duty to discharge the semen.


Masculinity,
Because of its wild imagination,
Given to cause this discharge and distribution,
Is trying and getting tired.
And this way of trying and getting tired
He become a poet or drunkard.

He imagines about sex a lot.
But nothing new he sees any where
Than getting fed-up and tired of.

Because of this hollowness and shallow nature,
His failure, tiresomeness and desperation
Of not being able to see or realize
Any meaning or crux or novelty
In anything he does, especially the sex,
Masculinity is made to be
More in poetry and philosophy,
Through his wild imagination and thinking,
Than those of woman folk in history.

He feels so hollow inside easily
Whereas womenfolk do not do the same that easily.

It is to cover up this hollow feeling
He has become more of power mongering
And popularity and fame wanting.


Though he imagines a lot,
Because of influence of the sexual hormones
Pressing him to discharge the semen,
On which he has no control,
He won't get more orgasm with/from woman
Than he would get
From/with the masturbation, to put it frankly.

Still he has a feeling
For having sex with woman
And to discharge his semen in woman.

It is just because of natural trap.
The trap of ensuring the distribution of seeds.
The trap to reach seed in its right place.
To ensure the continuity.
Utilization of at least one from the millions of sperms.

Any how, he is trapped in and with
Such feeling for sex, or discharge of semen
Only to see
This distribution/sowing is done.

Since his sexual feeling is part of
Ensuring the distribution/sowing of seeds,
It has no limit in yearning/wanting for more.

It will look for every chance that will enable
More distribution and more reaching of seed in right places.

He will look for one after the other.
This is to say frankly, very natural and compulsory.

A mango tree is given with millions of flower
And thousands of mangoes out of it.
All to make sure
At least one more mango seed and tree
Will come as its end result.

Masculinity’s ability
To discharge the semen
Is more frequent
Than only woman (wife) will require
And each drop of semen contains
Millions of sperm in it.

A woman would require, at the maximum,
Once in a year
To take maximum one sperm
Out of millions of the same in one time’s discharge
And to be pregnant with it.

Once she becomes pregnant, she won’t need
This semen and sperm from man.

At the maximum
She may need to have sex physically;
But not to receive the sperm from the semen.

And man has every tendency and inclination
To distribute this semen and sperm to more and more,
As it is the design of the nature or God.

Marriage?
Society needs a system
To keep each of its member
Accountable and responsible.
Especially the man, the masculinity.

So, the concept of marriage.

Marriage is more for woman's security than man's.

For man, marriage is for responsibility
For whatever the least he may get from it.

Marriage is to tie the man with the responsibility
To look after
His woman (wife) and children, if any.
(that is: Pennu Kettuka.
Means Pennu Purushane
Rakshappedaan sammathikkathe kettiyiduka).
Society's enabling of a woman to trap a man
With no chance for an escape.

It is not to tie (trap) the woman.
She is even otherwise trapped by nature
As and when she becomes pregnant easily.

Society and the system
Knows this fact
That the man by his nature
Will have the tendency
To go after many thousands,
Which can not be stopped
Except by putting responsibility and burden,
For the same, on him.

So, marriage, as such, is not a concept
Naturally ingrained in the nature of human kinds,
But by the social system..

Naturally, each man's and woman's hormones
Will lead him/her to have sex
With his or her opposite.
Will compel him to distribute or receive the seed.
Whether such distribution or receipt
Could be stopped artificially
Is a question different,
Which nature can not be concerned with.

This is more true and unquestionable
In the case of a man (masculinity).

He is fated to be a distributor of seeds.
And his distribution capacity is continuing
Through out his life.
It is not once a year
For once a year pregnancy of his woman, his wife.
It is an every day and every hour capacity.


Marriage as a barrier and as a system
Has nothing to do with any ones’
Natural feeling and instinct
To have sex, be it man or woman.

The seed distributors’
Emotions and passion for sex
Cannot be confined to one or two or thousands.
Even that of the receivers’, to put it frankly.

He/she is trapped with a wanting
To distribute/receive as much as he/she can.
Supported with the hormones
Required to strengthen this natural trap.

Naturally, what nature designs is that,
This duty of distribution of seeds
Cannot be accomplished
Only through the marriage of one or two.

Hence, the remaining part of his or her married life
Is more or less just a pretension
To get the security and respect
And keep his/her outward image intact.

********

If the man's sperm and semen was only for one wife,
It should not have been coming
Through out the month and year,
Day and hour.

At least it has to stop
When his wife becomes pregnant.

It has to stop when she menstruates.

Thousands of times
And billions of sperms are a waste.

It shouldn't come our for other women,
Than one his wife.
And one should not be attracted
To any other woman or man,
At least after marriage.

Marriage is only a dictation
Against the nature
And the nature of any man and woman

Tuesday, January 13, 2009

The stick (UN) Has to be straight

Dear Sir/Madam

In order to see the world in balance,
UN needs to be helpful with its tongue and action.
Helplessness shouldn't be the form of its tongue & action.

The stick (UN) on which the world has to hold and hang
Has to be straight and has to take the world in such a way
That the stick won’t get lost of its own balance or break.

Holding stick’s (UN’s) center point shouldn’t be shaky
And should be there without any change in its position.

If the stick loses its balance,
Or its center point changes it position,
Naturally, the whole world will be in imbalance.

The physical burdens of formalities
And its formal words
Will only deceive the world
And thereby break the UN (the stick).

The fire in the picture won’t cook the food for life.
And such formal words can’t fill the gap and do what is required.

Hearing and obeying lion’s talk is easy and understandable.
But to hear at the same time,
The pity of sheep/goats is what is required.
True, It is not that easy and workable, for sure, especially
When we become servants of the same lion
And get paid from it.

It needs the real hard work of spirit and attention
Rather than beautiful formal physical words of formalities

Monday, January 5, 2009

What is original is to laugh innocently.

Finally it took the place.
I was really waiting to see this.
The glass-bowl is broken.
For sure, we will bring in
Some other glass bowls again.
And this was history of human kinds.
Trying and getting tired
To be serious.

Because,
What is original is to laugh innocently.
Or to make others laugh innocently.
Like a child laughs purposelessly in his happiness.
Unlike the politicians and diplomats
With a purpose to cheat and gain.
Unlike the commercialist
With an eye on profit.
But like Buddha.

Is it not right?

All discussions will fade.
All pretensions of seriousness
And intellectuality will walk away.
Finally, only the original will prevail.
And that which prevails is what is true.

So, jokes and funs will take its place.
The reason is very simple.
Every one wants to be happy.
At any cost, be at the cost of the self and life.

That is where
The commercialism and consumerism
Trap us.
Without making us know
But using this our natural and inherent
Feeling and inclination.

Now, debaters are undoing their feuds.
Might not most of them have read
All the pages of discussions.
But, for sure, they all have read
Those jokes, wits and funs,
Though some of them were repetition.

But no one minds such repetitions.
Because,
They know and experience it
Through out their life.

All their life,
They were repeating
Each and every aspects of their life.
From breathing to bathing.
From eating to sleeping.
The reason is simple.
They like it.
They wanted to sustain and survive
With easiness.
They wanted to see
They live smooth and at ease.

To be true
Our life
Survives in silliness
And because of what we call silly things.

The small is
Bigger than the biggest.
Explosion of an atom is
Thousand times greater and dangerous
Than the explosion of mountains.

And no one can survive more
Without breathing silly
And without going to toilet for silly,
Where none of our pretension will work.

Maximum we can try is
Not to cause such wits and funs
And not be at the others’ cost
(be it an individual or a community)