To Safeguard Itself - All Soveriegn States Are cruel - Not only US.

Dear ...........

First of all,
Thanks for your prompt reply
And it is really appreciated.

You are right
And I completely agree with you,
Without going for any dispute,
Over the past US policies,
Its failure and cruelty side.

But can you also show me
Any sovereign state, to its size and level,
Without doing this
To safeguard its sovereignty and supremacy?

Do you know why Islam has prescribed
To kill any one who abandon Islam?

The reason, political/politicized Islam may say
Is the same.
To safeguard the sovereignty and its supremacy.

In miniature form, it is inherent in and with all.
Whether all isms and ideologies
Got enough chance to fully exhibit is
A question different.

Any human made system, including Islam,
And any human plan, based on his material wants and desire,
Can’t go long, except with cruelty and suppression,
Especially since the physicality of life is
Struggle and survival of the mightiest.
And this struggle and survival will be done
In different ways, especially when it is
Applied through sovereign states.

The problem is with human wants and desires
Not with America or Islamic State or USSR.

Detailing the negativities,
Seeking US collapse or chance of US collapse,
For no specific reason justifiable,
Without showing or giving any substitute,
That too when US is on its own
Correction and change path
Is different
Than seeing the negativities as a fact
And, at the maximum, seeking its correction.

And your article was justified in that way to a little extent,
To the extent that you have covered in such a way,
Than just looking for negativities,
Seeking only the collapse.


Than seeing, we are looking for what we want
With our hidden desires.
We were all seeking adversities and negativities in US.
That was what I was concerned with.

Is there any community or a state,
Especially where there is democracy and freedom of speech,
Without adversities, negativities,
Opposite views and movements?

So, what is meant by showing
Such negativities and opposite movements,
Which is quite natural in democratic states,
As the reason for easy collapse of US,
From its present day state of affairs?

Are we not seeking its collapse than seeing it?

I was asking you to see the chance of change in US
Through Obama and his new policies,
For whatever reasons
And with all limitations,
Especially in Afghan policy
Which you were trying to highlight in your Article
In different/opposite way,
And not to see and compare
The, much desired, possible collapse of US
With the collapse of USSR
And not to compare Obama with Gorbi in that way.

It is easy to talk about collapse,
But to re-instate any other in that place
Would be tougher.
And more tougher will be
To get it corrected by itself
From inside.

Left wing in India
Wanted to see Congress in India
Get lost of its political hold.
They tried with the support of regional (opportunistic) parties and like,
Which has no particular ideological stand at all.

But, could the same left wing be replaced in that place?

And what happened to those regional opportunistic parties.
When their chance for sharing power came,
They went with BJP.
With no shyness and question of accountablity.
Could the left wing stop them?

They could see more dangerous BJP coming
In the place of Congress.

And finally left wing regretted.
and they tried compenste it
by supporting Congress at any cost,
May be realising this mistake.


We all look at the immediate results.

That was, once, all Islamists all over the world
Were doing and praying against USSR.
That too with the support of this same US.

They did, played and prayed all their best
To see USSR collapse.

But, what happened?

A Unipolar world of US supremacy came in.

And now they regret for that and weep.

Especially when they see
No checks are available
To balance the power game of the world.
Now there is no other powerful one
To balance the world
By questioning and stopping
The unwanted and unjustified
Aggressions of US in Afghan or Iraq
Or any where.

But don’t forget, in the meantime,
US interference in Bosnian affair was not that bad,
And neither Saddam nor Kaddafi
Or Hosni Mubarak was a better choice too.

Now there comes the chance of
Balance and change
From inside US.
It its own correcting way.
With the slogan of hope and change.

So, please welcome it,
Especially if we have no other
Substitute to put forward.

So, try to be positive


That is all my humble request.

Dear .......,
Still I really congratulate you
For coming forward with a high quality Article.
Not because you are palloorian only.
But you have made it sensible and logical
To the level best.


With regards,


Raheem