Aren't women mentally ill? Does women's freedom mean exposing the female body?

Are women who show as much of their bodies as possible to get attention, or who are forced to, mentally ill?

********

Haven't you seen the American President appear in public? Fully covered.

Not just the American President. Haven't you seen the president or prime minister of any country appear in public? Fully covered.

What's more, all these male lions appear in public wearing a coat, tie, socks, and even shoes over clothes that already cover the whole body. Everything covered two or three times over.

But what about the wives who accompany the American President and all the other presidents and prime ministers? How do they appear in public?

As mere objects on display.

Showing as much of their bodies as possible.

Even in bitter cold.

Look: even in bitter cold, a woman has to walk around showing as much of her body as possible.

It has reached the point where there is no part of a woman's body left to show.

Not only has it come to this, that in the name of displaying beauty everything is shown and nothing is left to show, but the tragedy has also followed that men have lost all curiosity about women's beauty.

********

Aren't women who think women's freedom means exposing the female body mentally ill?

Is this what both those who speak of women's freedom, and the women who show more and more of their bodies (or are forced to) in the name of women's freedom, are essentially arguing: that women are fundamentally mentally ill?

Is freedom really showing, or being forced to show, as much as possible, in a way that makes the female body seem a mere object of pleasure?

Haven't all the women who speak of women's freedom and show (or are forced to show) as much of their bodies as possible fallen into the trap of a false notion and a lie called women's freedom?

Isn't it really because of the mental illness of mentally ill women that women feel the urge, or are compelled, to show more and more of their bodies?

Isn't it a lack of self-confidence that someone or other has stuffed into women?

Isn't it because someone or other stuffs women with this lack of self-confidence and exploits them that they have to use more and more cosmetics?

Why else does she have to gain attention only by exposing more and more of her nudity, and why must she try to gain attention only that way, if not because of that same lack of self-confidence mentioned above?

Who are the ones making it seem that women's freedom means showing, or being forced to show, more and more of a woman's body?

Look: nowhere in the world does a man ever show more and more of his body.

A man never has to show more and more of his body.

If freedom means showing the body, why don't men use that freedom to show more and more of their bodies?

Why do men decide, on men's behalf, that freedom means the freedom not to show the body?

Isn't the real meaning this: that women have been subjected to the mental illness of showing, or being forced to show, their bodies in the name of freedom, and that it is a male-dominated world, ogling and lapping up women's beauty, that defines what women's freedom is?