Sunday, August 9, 2026

An anti-ethanol (anti-E20) struggle won’t achieve anything significant

The main struggle in India shouldn’t be against ethanol-blended E20.

An anti-ethanol (anti-E20) struggle won’t achieve anything significant or bring about real change.


That struggle also won’t get any global support.


The struggle needs to be against:


The Election Commission.


The ED (Enforcement Directorate).


The real struggle needs to be against these two real problems and threats that are corroding democracy itself.


Because E20 by itself is not a huge wrong, E20 alone is not a huge wrong.


Gadkari’s son’s massive profit (due to a clear-cut conflict of interest) and the loot that the BJP carries out through it are separate issues that need to be dealt with separately.


E20 and beyond has been implemented, or is being considered for implementation, in some form in many places around the world. There are reasons and justifications of its own for that.


The problem lies in the fact that implementing E20 brings no benefit to the people.


The problem is that implementing E20 only brings losses and difficulties to the people.


Blindly protesting against ethanol will drown out and cause a loss of seriousness toward the more dangerous real issues that are killing the country and democracy, diverting attention away from them.


Therefore, the real problem that needs to be identified and protested against is the Election Commission, which wins elections for the BJP alone through whatever manipulation is needed.


The struggle needs to be against the ED, which works only for the BJP, wiping out the opposition and reducing democracy itself to ashes.


A massive struggle needs to happen against the courts and Supreme Court judges, who render the entire populace helpless, hopeless, and mere bystanders.


The entrenched problem here is the Election Commission.


The disease that truly needs to be cured here is the ED, the courts, the CBI, and several other agencies.


As long as the Election Commission is not fought and defeated on the streets, no one can defeat the BJP through elections.


No matter how united everyone stands and votes against the BJP, the BJP will keep winning through the manipulations the Election Commission carries out whenever and however needed. People will be left stunned, silenced.


This same Election Commission will also carry out the illusion trick of occasionally letting the BJP lose somewhere, giving out that sweetness to keep people quiet.


Therefore, the fierce struggle should be against:


1. The Election Commission, which has crucified democracy,

2. The ED, which threatens those who question,

3. The courts, which have turned justice into a mere bystander.


Only after that, if needed, should one speak out and struggle against ethanol-blended E20 —


with the clear understanding that it’s not E20, not the implementation of E20 itself that’s the problem,


but with the understanding that it’s the manner in which E20 is being implemented that is the problem.


Because:


1. E20 is being implemented citing air pollution. But the process of producing E20 causes more air pollution than using petrol would, along with massive water depletion.

2. The vast majority of ordinary people’s older vehicles are not suited for E20. There is no remedial measure that accounts for the difficulties, vehicle damage, and losses this causes them.

3. Another problem that keeps arising: the price of E20 petrol doesn’t go down, isn’t being reduced.

4. Yet, using E20 reduces mileage for the entire consuming public.

5. The price doesn’t go down, but the mileage does. In effect, the price has been drastically increased.

6. Who will compensate for all these losses?

7. Beyond E20 itself, there’s no remedy for the losses caused by E20, and no proportional price reduction — so who will protest this, and how, and how will the struggle be carried out?

Saturday, August 8, 2026

Of the three days spent in Chennai….

Of the three days spent in Chennai…..


Of going along when my son who went to join B.Tech Computer Science at SRM, Kattankulathur…..


Apologizing to Rajesh, who tried repeatedly to reach me…..


Like in a gallery, we become mere witnesses at the heart of the city.


We become nothing, we become no one.


We see everything, yet it’s as if we see nothing.


It makes us ask:


When does a human become human?


When does anything become anything?


Apart from simply becoming, is there any deliberate effort involved?


Apart from simply becoming, is effort even necessary?


If effort is necessary:


Does one become as someone else has defined it?


Should one become as someone else has defined it?


Does every word become what its speaker intended?


Or does every word require effort to become what its speaker intended?


And yet, some things remain:


Unfamiliarity is the true relic, the true possession of life.


You too will become a mere passerby: the first and last lesson the city teaches you.


No one, nothing: no one to anyone.


The address of unfamiliarity, the address of no one going anywhere — the address that any city gives to anyone.


This non-address that is an address: it renders submission, pretense, and hypocrisy unnecessary.


The one thing that guarantees freedom and newness: this non-address that is an address, unfamiliarity.


What we claim as familiarity: a trap we set for ourselves. A trap within the definitions and compulsions that familiarity creates.


Beyond all claims, everyone is a stranger to everyone else.


Everyone is alone, each in their own solitude.


Given this, when does a human become the human we understand as human?


When connecting with one another.


When able to connect with one another.


The capacity to connect with one another, the ability to connect with one another — that is a human’s capacity for communication.


It is the capacity for communication that makes the human we understand, human.


The first quality of communication is familiarity — the smile that creates familiarity, the smile that builds it.


If one cannot connect through communication…..,


if the capacity for communication is lost….,


if familiarity and the smile cannot be established…..,


the human has died.


Even while alive, the human has died.


The one catalyst that yields gain without loss: the smile, the response given through smiling.


The smile, responding with a smile — this is the unique trait that makes a human human. A trait belonging to humans alone.


One who responds with a smile becomes positive themselves.


That positivity is the profit the smile gives them.


And the one who sees that smile?


They too profit.


Because the one who sees a smile becomes positive the very moment they see it.


Smiling back in return — that positivity is shown by them too, immediately.


This is how positivity sows, reaps, and multiplies positivity.


That it turns everyone who sees a smile into someone who smiles — this is the revolution, the continuity that a smile creates.


Familiarity and the smile sow positivity a hundredfold with positivity, and reap it a hundred-thousandfold.


It is the smile that makes one burning candle light a hundred thousand other candles.


The name for the process by which a single seed splits itself open, sprouts, grows, and produces a hundred thousand seeds — that name is smile.


This is also, in part, why it is said that man is a social animal.


The human with the capacity to communicate, the human who feigns familiarity, the human who smiles — is a social animal.


This is also, in part, why the human with the capacity to communicate, who feigns familiarity, who smiles, has brought about revolutions of change in the world.


Like waves, one after another, hundreds of thousands of changes and revolutions have been made continuous.


This is how being a social animal became the one face of humanity, the one definition of humanity, the foundation for all change and all revolution.


When do humans become human?


When they become one who responds.


Not just humans — every living being becomes that being, every human becomes that human, every moving thing becomes that moving thing, only through the capacity to respond.


A being, a human, that has lost the capacity to respond has, in effect, died — has ceased to be alive. The moving has become the unmoving.


Another word in language for response is answer, reply.


If one fails to give an answer (or reply), then that person (or being) has died.


The capacity to give an answer or response is responsibility.


(responsibility = ability to respond)


If you are not responsible (if you cannot respond), know also that you have become a lifeless corpse.


You are your own magnitude.


Your life is your magnitude.


The magnitude of life and living is magnitude — your magnitude.


Life and living reside in responsiveness.


One who cannot respond has lost life.


The magnitude of life and living is the magnitude of that responsibility called responsiveness.


The one being that stands highest in response-ability — in response-ability-conscience — is the human.


The one trait that makes a human human is that responsibility, that responsiveness called responsibility.


Know this: your success is your happiness.


If you are not happy, you have not succeeded.


Your success is your happiness — a measure no one else can take, a yardstick no one else holds.


You become wealthy only if you yourself feel it is enough.


If it is not enough, if you feel it falls short, you are poor.


Whether it is enough for you, whether it suffices — this too is something no one else knows, something that cannot be measured or understood by another.


That is why one person remains poor, remains a failure, even while living in a palace.


That is exactly why another person becomes content and successful even while living on the street, in a hut.


However great you may consider yourself to have become: it is right there that you become nothing, no one — that you find you cannot become anything or anyone.


A mango tree will not bear jackfruit. A kanjiram tree will not bear jasmine either.


The quality of the seed will always show itself, will always come out, wherever and whenever.


A wolf in sheep’s clothing is not a sheep; it is only, purely, a wolf — that is how and when this becomes evident.


That is how and when it becomes true that if there is no compatibility, nothing that exists matters.


If there is no compatibility:


Milk will curdle.


The egg will fail to set.


The seed and the plant will rot.


However much and however many things you may come to own, it is right there, right then, that you become poor.


When your identity becomes the illusion of the property, wealth, house, car, job, and institutions you own….


When your identity is no longer that of the life you live, the life you have lived…


If your identity is that of the things you own, know that you are not the owner — you are the slave.


You are the slave of the property, wealth, house, car, job, and institutions you own.


One who must labor for them, as they dictate.


You are merely a donkey, uselessly bearing burdens.


The burden-bearing donkey also believes:


that it is the owner of the burdens it carries.


that it too possesses the identity those burdens confer.


But the burden-bearing donkey never comes to know the content or meaning of the burden it carries.


It is a burden-bearing donkey only because it is forced to bear the burden.


In effect, we are exactly the same.


There is nothing to gain or lose that is not life itself.


Who lived well is something no one else can determine or define.


That is precisely why one who must live performing for others is merely a slave to those others.


One who gains respect is a slave to those who respect him.


One who lives to gain respect is a slave to those he must be respected by.


How he must live, how he must behave — that is decided by those who respect him.


Those who respect are the owners, the masters.


The one who is respected is the slave, the subordinate.