Reply to my brother Razak's observations on my earlier post "Mohammed or Jesus got no one to follow"

Dear Razak,

Ignorance is everyone's knowledge.

To the extend that nobody knows

The function and depth of a simple cell of their body.

Helplessness is everyone's strength and power.

To the extend that nobody is able to control

The function of a simple cell of their body.

Dear Razak.

I truly know and acknowledge 

The above simple and humble fact

Of ignorance of all.

And truly I believe and

I do try to make it clear that

God, the almighty, will also 

Know and acknowledge the above

Humble and simple fact.

-The fact of ignorance and helplessness 

Of everyone in this world

Of relatives and relativity.

So was I trying, dear Razak,

To say God will contract himself

For all those majority who are unable

To expand themselves to the level God is.

So as God is to each one

According to each one’s level and understanding,

In both their belief and disbelief.

So will God accept and understand all 

With all their helplessness and ignorance

Irrespective of their calling him or not calling him

With or without a name or too many different names.

So am I, Razak, extreme

About and against extremism of your monotheism, 

And about and against your exclusivity claim for Islam,

About and against confining God 

And giving full stop to God and his messages 

In one place, one book, one person and one time,

Of Mohammed and Quran as final and last,

Thereby denying God and his messages to all other

Places, books, persons and time.

So am I, Razak, un-defining and freeing God

To be a God of all definitions, as accessible to all

Or a God suiting to all definitions and talks about him.

A God talking, walking and working throughout

Through all and everything

Making everyone and everything

To be his prophets, instruments,

Tools and hands and words, and 

Using the same above said ignorance of relative world

As a cover against everyone and everything

In getting all these done, walked  and talked

Through everyone and everything,

Every time, everywhere...

So am I, Razak, intolerant too about and against

The intolerance of not accepting others' chance

To be right about and in front of the absolute

God and truth, with all their differences.

*************

Dear Razak, the question in core is:

How did Mohammed or Jesus

Or Krishna or Buddha or Mahaveera

Get reach and access to God and truth?

Was it with and through any support

Of any particular religion or path?

The answer is big "No"

To any particular religion or path.

If not so,

Which religion or path in particular

They were following to realize

What they could realize as truth and God?

The answer  again is big "No"

To any particular religion or path.

Mohammed or Jesus

Or Krishna or Buddha or Mahaveera

Did not get reach or access

To God and truth

With any support of any particular

Religion or path.

They did follow themselves

And did not follow any particular

Religion or path to be able

To realize and get enlightened with

What they could realize and get enlightened.

Rather they did realize and get enlightened

By rebelling and rivaling all existing religions and paths.

At least without following

Any particular path or religion

Though there came up

Many other paths and religion

In and by their name, after their death.

Dear Razak, it is,

Just because God and truth is openly open

As available and accessible to all equally

In whatever and whichever way

They sincerely approach and want to see.

Then the question again is, dear Razak:

Even otherwise,

What role and relevance is there for any religion

In helping anyone reach and access God and truth?

No role and relevance at all.

Furthermore to say,

God and truth are not at all

The properties of any religion

In particualr.

God and truth are

Equally each and everyone's property.

Believing or not believing

In God or truth

Doesn't matter at all.

And nobody has to want

To believe or disbelieve

In God or truth.

At least, it won't be

A requirement and demand

From God at all,

And it will never affect God at all

In his being or position or power.

And dear Razak,

If at all there is any role and relevance

For any particular religion or path

It is to deny the real sight, reach and access

Of and to God and truth.

*************

Yes Razak I am defending this truth and God of

Accepting and accommodating all equally true and wrong

Irrespective of their difference in religion, region or language

And irrespective of their becoming monotheists or polytheists

Or giving different names in different languages and places

I am defending just to deny the extremism, intolerance 

And exclusivity claim of any in particular

Just to say that the truth and God is

To and for all the same and forever the same,,

Talking and not taking, accessible and not accessible

To all equally in and with same density and intensity.

************ 

Razak, I have nothing else to say as a reply to you.

Especially when you prove yourself through your reply

All the points I was raising in my earlier message.

All your made up five criteria for the truth to be truth

Suits to the concept of a God and truth

Equally accessible to and accommodating all, all the time

Without any discrimination and without needing to resort to 

Any particular person or book in a particular time.

Such your criteria, dear Razak, suits to a God of

Conscience and common sense 

(Differently available to each different one

Accepting the limits and limitations of each)

As equally applicable to all in all the place and time.

Dear Razak,

It suits to a God never failing

And n ever becoming desperate, fearing and wanting 

And to a God without any full stop to talk, walk and interfere.

*************

True, Razak, we all need to go for introspection,

To know whether we do and talk 

For and by the people around us

And to know whether we are in strictly accordance

With our conscience and conviction,

Not with and for the conviction of others

Or  not as influenced by any other factors of

Birth or fame or money or power or security.

Dear Razak, such introspection only will give us

The chance of knowing our selves, soul.

The great self-knowledge and realization.

The self-knowledge and realization

Of knowing and realizing God, the absolute, thereby.

Based on such introspection only, dear Razak,

I am cent per cent and more sure that

I did not do or go for anything wrong throughout,

That I was and I am not at all influenced

While I talk about God and truth.

Dear Razak,

Could I have been viewed

As a wrong doer or deviated one

By the people of so called narrow defined religions  

With a narrow  defined and confined God and truth,

And because of their rigid and relative outlook or concept

About right and wrong.

Dear Razak, for sure, such their concepts will dictate

To consider me or anyone with absolute God and truth

As wrong doers and deviated people from right path.

So was I and so will I be wrong for them and you.

.

But, dear Razak, not in front of my conscience 

And not in front of the absolute God of totality.

In front of the absolute God of totality

And in front of my conscience and common sense

I was and I will be always right.

At least, Razak, you have to know

God, the almighty, the absolute

Doesn't go with narrow concept and definition 

Of right and wrong of and from relative world.

With kind regards,

Raheem