Mohammed or Jesus got no one to follow. Even Krishna and Buddha did not.

Yes Razak,

Your interpretations are great.

I can do nothing 
But appreciate you whole-heartedly.  

You can make a cup into an ocean,
With your pen and tongue. 

But I fear,

If it is at the cost of 

Real ocean of all truth 

From where the water 
In your cup were taken. 

I fear, 

If it is to say only Mohammed got 

A cup of water from the ocean
And what all others got, after him,
Is not and can never be the water 
From the same Ocean, God. 

I fear,

If it is to say what Mohammed collected 
Only is 

What the whole ocean? 

I fear,

If it is to say only the cup (Quran)
Can and should remain

As both the cup and the ocean,

Not and never any other cup or ocean 
Other than the cup of Quran.

I fear,

If it is to say no one else can go
And no one else has to go 

To and near the same ocean again

To collect another cup of water, 

After Mohammed and Quran.

I fear,

If it is to say the ocean (God) is 

Such a small and narrow thing 

(In time and space) 

That nothing else after Quran 

Can be God's word or talk
And the ocean is only 
The cup that is Quran.

I fear,
If it is to mislead or lead
Innocent or ignorant people (Muslims) 
To the dead end of 
Extremism and intolerance,
To the dead end of not being able
To co-exist and cohabit with others
Of different belief system,
Thereby to terrorism,
Just for the reason,
And without needing any other reason,
That they take, as you interpret and claim,
Islam, Quran and Mohammed
As the only religion, book and prophet,
From God,
That is comprehensive, complete,
Exclusive and last and final.

I fear,
Your interpretation are such
That it would defeat God and Mohammed
To the extend that 
God and Mohammed 
Could not do and explain
What you could do and explain.

I fear,
You would have to say and claim
God and Mohammed was at failure
To read and reveal into
The commonsense of common people
And to their easy digestion.
And needed the support of interpretation
To get God's revelation digested
In the way, as you claim,
God really wants.

Also I fear, Razak, that
You want to establish more
The existence of devil than God
And the belief in devil than in God
So as to enable you to make
Commands of do-s and don'ts
In the name of God.
Without establishing devil
How can you get chance 
To talk about and represent God?
How can you make laws and rules
In the name of God?
That is why and where, Razan,
Quran, which you claim is of God,
Becoming the words and verses of devil,
And the words and verses made for devil.

Dear Razak,
What else would one need
To be extreme and intolerant
If he happens to believe, 
As you claim and interpret,
Only Islam, Mohammed and Quran is right
And only Islam, Mohammed and Quran is,
Comprehensive, complete,
Exclusive and last and final, from God.

And what can one do, 
But be extreme and intolerant,
If such a believer is asked to deny 
The chance of all other belief systems, 
Books and people from being right
And to believe all of them are 
Inevitably wrong
And are not from God, but devil?

Especially, dear Razak,
And what would happend to such believers,
But be aggressively extreme
If such claims and interpretations
By Islamic scholars and leaders are
With the threat of hell
And the promise of heaven
For believing in and following Islam
Or for disbelieving or not following Islam?

************* 

Dear Razak,

I cannot debate. 

Just for the reason that

Debate creates only enemies, 

Never any friend.
Only the noise, 
Never the meaning.
Only the suffocation,
Never breathing in and out. 

Just for the reason that

No one in debates wins,
Both claim their win. 

And no one in debates 
Admits his loss or defeat.

Just for the reason
That debates are not done
To give and take, or
To share and grow, 
But to deny and defeat 
And win over the other .

Just for the reason,
Beyond all proofs and logic, 
If one of the debaters'
Main weapon to win is 
A promise of heaven or
A  threat of hell,
That too using the cause of
Death and after life.

Just for the reason

To be winning in debates

It will be a must 
For your audience
To quote and refer

From the source that 
Your audience accept and approve.

Dear Razak
M M Akbar, Zakir Naik and you

May have lot and enough

To quote and refer such
From Quran, Bible and Gita
To argue vigorously and
With great objectivity.

So, naturally, in front of 
Such ignorant majority,
(Who don't know
What they do, believe,
Talk and follow)
Victory will always be yours.

Especially,

As long as Quran, Gita and Bible

Remain and prevail objectively

As the divine books and reference-point 

And as long as the subjectivity,
Common sense and conscience,
Becomes a big curse and burden
For the majority in the audience.

But for me Razak,
Common sense and conscience
Is the only reference-point and book.

Where nothing of such kind 
I will get to quote and refer.

As for me Razak, through anyone, 

For whom God stays in his conscience,

God and truth reveals 
And talks throughout.

And as for me, this is what 

Mohammed and Jesus meant

When they said 

They got revelations from God.

Every one such gets 

Revelations from God 

Every now and then.

Common sense and conscience.

Is one's only mirror:
Wherein one can reflect himself

And be truthful thereby.

Wherein God and truth 
Reveals himself and itself
Throughout and continuous.
God and and truth is
Through me and you and all,
Unless the doors or windows
Of conscience and commonsense,
Already open otherwise,
Are not closed.
So, just need to keep
The doors of commonsense
And conscience open
Or acknowledge it.
That is all.
God is and will be there. 
Truth is and will be 
Revealed and talked.
Throughout and all along.

Wherein
The objectivity gets lost
And subjectivity gets 
Remaining and prevailing. 

Wherein rules and stipulations
For and of life and the world
Do not come from external,or from
Any particular time, 
Or person of book,
But it trickles from and within 
Life and its flow
Continuous and throughout
As continuous dance and walk
Of God or life.
Without a stop in any place,
Or in any time or language 
Or in any book or person. 

Common sense and conscience
Requires only this much:
'If you happen truthfully
To know and believe, 
Believe and know.
If you happen truthfully
Not to know and believe,
Do not know and believe.'
That much is and will be 
The want and need of 
Never wanting or needing God,
Or of conscience and commonsense.

*********************

The majority is ever made and misled

To disbelieve and doubt themselves,

Their conscience and common sense,
So that to close all their windows and doors.

So is it a requirement and relevance for them 

Of revelations through specific person or book
In specific time or place.

And so is it their need 
Either go for any religion 
Or for any kind of intoxication.
Just to make sure that
They forget themselves
And escape from their 
Conscience and common sense.

Zakr Naik and such hard core debaters

With external proofs and references

In front of their majority group 

Will always be the clear-cut winners.
They can easily win over the public
With their scholarship than common sense.

As long as people are easily ready
To sell and forget themselves
For external position and possession
And to identify themselves 
With such externals.

***********

So, tell me Razak,
If that is the case of debates,

Is there any point in debating

In front of such public audience?

Can subjectivity be presented

The way objectivity, objective God 

And its objective truth 
Is presented?

Dear Razak

Those who have more popular support 

Easily get cleared and declared won. 

Abu Jahals and Namroods ever

Got the brute majority
In popular support.

And anyone who goes debating 

In support of existing belief system,

Easily gets the certificate of winning
From the audience he is in. 

He can easily quote, 
Misquote and manipulate. 

The whole atmosphere will be 
Supportive and favorable
To and for him.

Dear Razak,

Debate causes latching of 

Already closed rooms from inside. 

Especially in any normal case
People tend to rest their head 

Easily on the old and told. 

The sound of debate is 

The sound of knocking at

Each other's doors and its latching. 

It is only sending of smoke out, 

Allowing no fresh air get in.

Whereas, dear Razak,
To be both giving and taking
You need to be open.
Open from both ends,
From bottom and top,
From left and right,
From front and back.

Only in openness
Fresh and new stays,
Change becomes life and flow.

Openness causes
Everything everytime changed
And causes only the new and fresh
Stay, that too not for long.

Dear Razak

For the majority of the people,

As you may know,

Belief in religion or God is

By birth or is attributed by birth. 

And that is where
The strength and support 

That all existing religions enjoy.

And this is true when the fight is 

Between themselves too, 

Or between the wings/groups/factions

Within such religions. 

People don’t need much 
Reasoning and justifications
To start believing in 
What their forefathers and their society 
Believed and followed. 

But with thousands of such logic 
And justifications otherwise, 
In most of the cases, 
They won't change their belief 
Got from their society and forefathers
Just by the qualification of their birth in it. 

Belief first by birth. 
Then from the community they live in.

Only later, they want to get
Justifications and logic for such beliefs 
From scholars and leaders like you
That too to help them  
Not to think further and otherwise.

People easily go by the belief 

They get by birth 

Or from the society they live in
With no kind of resistance or frictions. 

So, with your quotes/misquotes 

And with your interpretations too, 

Without needing to go

Too much deep into. 

They want and learn 
Only to resist and defend 
The old and told

And keep away anything new

That will change and unsettle them, or

Their already got belief system and status.

Dear Razak,

Newton's first law of motion
Suits for religions
And religious believers the most.
Same way it suits the most
For politicians and political parties.

People tend and try
To rest and stay on old and told,
The way they are already in.
They won't like to move an inch
From where they are already in.
Or if at all they happen to be
In any kind of motion
Then, they will continue
To stay in such a motion
With the same speed
And in the same direction
Unless acted upon
By and with an extra force.

Here lies the strength and courage
Of all political parties in democracy
And of all religions and religious believers

In spirituality.

That is why, dear Razak,

As you may know better,
AP and EK Sunni groups

Get more support in Kerala 

When Jamaath and Mujahid groups

Have to confront with them in such matters. 

People usually don't like to  rival or rebel. 

They just want to remain safe and continue.
So to defend what is. 

So, dear Razak,

What is the use of debating in front of them, 

Especially on subjective matters?
Debate can be only on 
The objectivity you created
And your religion represents.

Let them continue with
Whatever belief system they have
By the grace of their birth and life
In such a particular society,
Unless they deny the chance of others
Being right and righteous
And unless they become 
Extreme and intolerant thereby.

Dear Razak,
What is the use of making the subject of 
Believing in God or in absolute truth
An objective matter?
Why to ensure everyone believes
In one and the same way
As dictated by 
Only one book or one person.

For sure you can easily declare yourself winning. 

Like Kanthapuram or such other Sunni scholars did

In the past against Mujahid or Jamaath scholars. 

People can't and won't strictly follow 

What scholars/writers quote and misquote.

They can't strictly go with and weigh 

The merits and demerits 

Of the talks for and against their belief system.
  

Most of them are very keen 

In keeping their social status 
And financial security intact, 

So not to change from 
The belief system of their ancestor. 

That was what people of Arabia did

When Mohammed came with new.

Later Mohammed got strength 

Only with politics and political victory,
That too after he left for Medina. 

Against political power very rarely 
General people rebel and talk in open.
Mostly they tend to enjoy the benefits of
Going hand in hand with power and victory,
Or if not possible, talk only from behind.

Only to the group of power and victory
People start entering and joining 

In further big groups (afwaajan).
So people entered in big groups
Into the fold of Mohammed too 
Only after it became the fold of 
Victory and power.

So, the same jahileen (ignorant)
Who resisted for, and defended, the status quo

Became the followers and flag bearers

Of Mohammed then and now. 

99% of the people following Mohammed,
As Muslims then and now,

Are the people like Abu Jahl. 
They are Jahileen (ignorant).
They never belong and 
They never belonged
To what Mohammed really said
And stood for.
They don't know what they
Believe, talk and do.

They are born Muslims
And they follow Mohammed
Only to rest their head
On old and told.
Not to risk and
Not to have to take risk of
Further thinking and learning.

They just want to escape from the risk of

Having to search and verify further.

They just want to safeguard the present.

Their social and financial status and security.

So, dear Razak,
The people whom you call Muslims,
Your followers,
Go with jahl, ignorance, and
With the knowledge of ignorance.

With the support of Jahl, ignorance,
With its new interpretatory knowledge, 

And with the support of 
The scholars and leaders of such Jahl. 

Dear Razak,

This is not my becoming judgmental. 

It is only a statement of fact, 

Which happens and happened throughout

And which you will know better than me.

This cannot be debated 

In front of such a jahil groups either. 

Leaders and interpreting scholars are lucky 

That most of their followers do not know 

And do not want to know and take risk of 

Thinking further or otherwise 

To find the real God and absolute truth

Of freedom and spontaneity,

Of life and its flow. 

*************************

Dear Razak,

With regard to spirituality, 

With regard to God and absolute truth, 

People mostly tend to rest and rely 

On their forefather, scholars and leaders.
On the old and told.

They will be happy with whatever

Quotes and interpretation they get 

To justify their present belief system. 
To the old and told.

They won't give 
Much thought and time for that, 

Except for doing certain rituals 

To conceal and console 
Their guilt and guilt feeling 

Or to get an escape/intoxication
Of forgetfulness. 

But dear Razak,

With regard to material search and earning 

They won’t rely and trust only on 

Their forefather or leaders and scholars. 
They will not rest only on old and told.

They will work hard till their end. 
They will learn and experiment 
New methods and ways.

They will never make it enough, 
Even if they happen to die 
With their such earning efforts or burning self

And even if their earnings get piled up

Beyond their levels and expectations 
That their earnings will bury them in it.

For that they will change

Time and again 
Their levels and expectations.

They will ensure that they burn

Till they earn ash of their own life.

So, till the end of their life.

So, dear Razak 

This majority is there
And will be there with you 

To get more validation to their 
Old and told belief. 

Search of absolute truth and God,

They will leave it to you, 

And to their scholars, leaders and ancestors

With all their strong support. 

They are just ready to follow, blindly. 

And, as you may know, 

Abu Jahl was not different in this case.  
He just wanted to defend 
And keep the status quo
Of old and told.

And Present day Muslims too are and will be, 
Unlike Abu Jahl, 

So good and innocently in doing so, 

As they are also given with 

Further promise/threat of 
Heaven and hell.

***************

Sorry Dear Razak,

I have limitations in communicating 

With and through WhatsApp. 

First of all I don’t use 
Smart phone for myself. 

Secondly I am not at all an expert

(Very slow and uncomfortable) 

In typing and editing on smart phones. 

And thirdly, very rarely I happen 

To see WhatsApp through Fahira’s mobile 

And hit my comment in it for a fun, 
Without needing to hurt any one personally.

Dear Razak

Ayah you quoted in WhatsApp 

To illustrate the freedom 

Of believing and disbelieving 

Was not about what will be 
In Islamic State. 

You do quote and interpret any ayah 

And say this is this 
Or mango is jack-fruit. 

People following, as you know, 

Are mostly unaware of 
What is what 
And what is in Quran 

With its real context and meaning 

So debating in front of them in this way 

Won’t do any good to the core. 

It would even become like 
What Kanthapuram did with Mujahid. 

He did use such technique 
To defeat Mujahids in the past. 

Once, (this is only what I heard)
He asked Mujahid Scholars
To recite Suraal Ikhlas.

When they recited Sura Al Ilkhlas

He started shouting and claiming 

"Mujahid moulavis have agreed 

Sura Al Ikhlas is a Quranic Sura". 

Poor innocent followers declared him win. 

They did not know and didn't want to know
The core and central theme of the debate. 

They did not want to weigh and compare 
The merits and demerits of arguments.

Luckily they had the brute majority to do so.  

Dear Razak,

Your quotation's context was not Islamic State 

And what would happen in an Islamic state 

In the event of conversion from the religion of Islam. 

It was  just a general statement. 

That Ayah was not meant 

To give freedom of expression and belief 
In Islamic State.

And as you may know, 

Freedom is not something to be given. 

It is one's right by birth. 
Inherent in every birth and life.

Only thing is that 

Freedom of expression and belief 
Should not be curtailed. 

Any expression curtailing and denying 

The freedom of expression and belief 

Will have to be noted, not otherwise.

Especially one's conscience is  
The transparent-most place for God
To see what each one is believing
And to stay therein hiding most possibly.

Detached from one's own conscience,
Dishonest to one's own conscience,
Knowing not what he himself is,
Really one becomes afraid, 
Unable to stay alone,
Face himself face to face.
An hypocrite or a true disbeliever.

Afraid so, he would need to be engaged
In one or other activity ever
So as to escape from and evade
His own self. Not to know himself.

Dear Razak, 

I am totally unable to believe 

Why God should punish people at all,

If they can’t understand and know God

In one particular way as dictated
(Which is equal to idolization)

Or in a very particular way 

Mohammed or some other 
Wanted or knew.

Why should one be killed,
For converting from Islam
In Islamic State
In the beautiful name of 
Treason and apostasy
And with the beautiful interpretation 
With the ayah
"Al Fithnath Ashaddhu MinalQathl"? 

Why should God punish at all 
For one's inability to believe.

To believe in God is and should be a matter of 

One's ability and inability

With the faculties and limitations

He is given with. 

To believe in God is not
And should not be God's
Desperate need or want.
Respecting God should not be
A foolish requirement of God.

Why should God be that helpless 

To make belief in him happen 

If one cannot in real terms 

Understand and believe 

The way Mohammed or God knows of God?

Rather God has to be appreciative of

Anyone who happens not to believe 

The way others do by imitation or lie,
Just because he is unable to witness
And testify himself by his own.
(Meaning and doing real shahaadath).

Just because such a disbeliever

Is a honest person, or

At least not a hypocrite.
He is not an imitator,
Falsely claiming his belief
Or doing false witnessing.

He is the one who thinks

And takes the risk of 

Not resting his head 

On old and told.
And he is the one 
Who is ready to lose 
His social and financial
Status and security.

Why God should be depicted in such ways 

As desperate, helpless, wanting, angry 

Towards his creation's inability 
To understand and believe in him 

The way Mohammed or some other 
Believed or understood him? 

Why should God be asking 
For belief and respect at all

That too in such foolish way,

By giving offers, schemes, discount, etc.,

Or by threatening of punishing in hell

Or by not accepting any good act or deed
From disbeliever 
Done innocently and selflessly, 
Unlike the believers?

Razak ... shame on such a God
And shame on such a depiction of God.

Dear Razak,

The God I know and I can know

Is a God understandable to all

In any way they can

And is a God understanding all 

With all his creations'
Limitations and inabilities.

For me he is a God 

Who can and who will understand 

The limitations and inabilities 
Of all and humans. 

For he is a God
Who talks and reveals himself
Through common sense and conscience.

For me 
My belief in God is not
A matter and need 
Of God
But a need  and a matter
Of me alone.

For me,
He is a God who won’t have to 

Compel anyone to look 
Fr him and his truth into 

Only one book, one time, 

One language, one place,
One direction and one person, 

Or else wanting to punish them all. 

God I know is a God of 
All books and words, 

Be it is of me or you or Pamman 
Or Basheer or Einstein. 

He is the one 
Talking and intervening 
Everywhere, every time
And causing everything 

To happen then and there, 
Now and here, 

For the reasons 
Within and without 
The control of his creations. 

God I know is a God
Reachable, accessible 
And referable from and through

Any book, any time, 

Any language, any place,

Any direction and any person.
Referable through one's own
Commonsense and conscience too.

God I want to present and represent 
Is a God emancipated from the claws 

Of all religions and its definitions, 

Accessible, knowing and knowable 

To and for all 
In any way and name they want.
In any time and place they want. 

This is  the revelation I get 
About God, from God. 
This is the revelation
Any one with common sense will get 
About God, from God.
And this the revelation
Anyone who keeps his conscience open
Get about God, from God.

Such a God won't be a God 
Having to ask and want 

To believe in him desperately. 

He won't be the one 
Having to ask 
Each and everyone desperately

To market him, that too, 
With great offers, schemes and discounts.

**************

Dear Razak,

As I said , Islam is right. 

Not because Islam only is right,
Or inevitably right,
Or not because
All other belief systems are wrong,
Or inevitably wrong.

But dear Razak,

Islam is right just because 

All other religions are equally right. 

All are equally right 

Because all are equally wrong. 

In this relative world,
And in this world of relativity, 

To put positively you can say, 

All are equally right,
Because all are equally wrong too. 

And if you want to put it negatively 

You can say all are equally wrong,
Because all are equally right too. 

Especially the concept and beliefs 

About absolute truth and God. 

Dear Razak,

In the mean time,

Islam is, or Islam becomes, 
Wrong too,

Only when it claims 

Only Islam is right, final and exclusive
And only Islam can be right, final and exclusive.  

Dear Razak,

There is nothing special in Islam

To make only Islam final, right and exclusive. 

There is nothing special in Quran too 

To make Quran only final, right and exclusive. 

It is only a book 
Like any other book, unique.

Sometimes Quran is and can be
Less than many other books
And sometimes Quran is and can be
More than many other books.

Dear Razak

It is true, indisputably true
No one can write another book 

Like Quran is written. 

But it is also indisputably true and right 
That no one can think and write

Like Vaikom Muhammed Basheer or Razak 

Or like Pamman or Shakespeare too. 

All are equally thought and written unique.
As everything is equally unique, 
Happening equally unique. 

Things once happened is never repeated.

Imitations are only imitations.

Never is it a repetition. 

Copying cannot mean 
Repeating or writing again. 

And writing same way same thing 

Is and will only be 

An imitation or copying or plagiarism.

Dear Razak,

Quran is  a book divine and Godly

Just because all in this universe is 
Divine and godly. 

Nothing is other than from God
And nothing is other than that of God. 

Mohammed is a prophet 

Just because nobody is other than a prophet, 

In each one's respective field, spot and time.
Only difference is Mohammed (especially Khadija)
Happened to know this and claimed,
But never denying others'such chance. 

God’s interference and revelations are continuous,

Never stopping in time and place.

It causes the progress and flow of life throughout. 

It comes and happens through all of us too.

(Through each and every one 

In respective field, time and way).  

***************** 

Dear Razak,

I can dare say 

I am with God 

And I am talking only the truth, 

Without expecting 
And without having to expect
Any reward or respect. 

I can do it alone and
I want to do it alone, selflessly, 

Being truthful to my own conscience, 

So being truthful in front of 
God, the totality, too. 

I can also daresay, Razak, 

I am talking for and on behalf of 

God and truth. 

Whatever I do and talk is 

What God does and talks. 

Like any so called 
Or so attributed prophet
I too am, like you too are,
The tool and hand of God.

It is not only true in my case. 

Whatsoever is done and talked 

In this universality, 
By anything and anyone

Is what God does, talk and do. 

God is the one 
Talking and doing
Through all, 
Throughout and all along,

With no full stop
And without having to claim. 

God is the flame and flow.

Continuing through life and its flow. 

Causing life and the universe 

Progress and expand. 

Giving revelation through 
Each and every one. 

Be it you or me or Mohammed 

Or Einstein or Copernicus.  

**************

Dear Razak, 

Just I am emancipating 

(Already free God) 

From the clutches of religions 

In the world of relatives. 

I just want to see God and truth is 

For all the same 

And all are equal to God and truth. 

Easily accessible and reachable. 

As for me,

Mohammed and Jesus freed God and truth, 

But political Islam and Christianity 

Again confined God and truth. 

But no problem and nothing to complain,
God or truth
Never gains or lose any thing.
God never complains and worries.
God and truth is same
In quantity and quality,
Irrespective of  anyone's
Belief or disbelief
In him or truth.

Denying or believing
In God or truth,
You are never
Closer to or farther from
God or Truth.
You are only in and with
Truth and God.

God and truth is a continuously 
Revealed and flowing fact. 
Political Islam and Christianity wanted it 

To be stopped with it for all.
But couldn't do so
Just for the reason
The revelation from God of truth 
Is just a continuous unstoppable flow.

Political Islam and Christianity claimed 

For Mohammed and Jesus 

What Mohammed and Jesus I know

Did not do and claim for themselves,

And what Mohammed and Jesus did not like 

To do and claim for themselves. 

Mohammed I know 
Did not want to see him 

As the last and final.
He did not claim him only
To be the prophet, but all,
If they happen to know as such. 

So only, Mohammed I know
Did not come with a book of Quran 
In his lifetime.

And no one with Mohammed collected 
His words (hadith) or Quran 
When he was alive. 

God also did not give Mohammed 

The so called and claimed to be

The last and final book in any book form, 
As seen today, written and compiled. 

And there is nothing special 

To make Quran only in particular 
To be the words of God,

(Even after getting it compiled 

By humans in an artificial way
By heavy political will) 

And to make it only 
A divine, last and final book. 

Islam caused a kind of politics
And the same politics caused
The Islam and Quran to happen
As it is today.

Political Islam wanted 
Not to be questioned and disputed at all. 

So did they have to give 
A full stop to prophet-hood.
So, did they have to kill Musailima.
So did they have to give finality to 
Quran, Islam and Mohammed.

It wanted to give a full stop to it, 
Its book and its Mohammed 

So that no one and no book 
Coming after him and Quran
Can question Islam and its politics. 

Like the case of any country's constitution 

Mohamed and Quran became. 

Unquestionable.  

Dear Razak,

I will not be unhappy at all

If I don't get even one to follow. 

I don't do this 
With and for a group with me.

I am doing and talking it alone.

I am happy to know and embrace

God and truth alone.

Feeling and experiencing alone.
Giving every else too the same freedom
To embrace, feel and experience
Truth and God alone.

Absolute truth and God 
Can be felt and experienced only alone.
Just subjectively. idolized.
Never objectively idolized.

I do think Mohammed and Jesus 
Were doing so. 

I don't think Mohammed or Jesus 
Or Krishna or Buddha
Got anyone to follow in real terms
In this way. 

Billions of Muslims are not 
The real Mohammed's followers.
Neither Christian or Buddhists or Hindus
Are of Jesus or Buddha or Krishna.

They can't be.  Because,
No one can follow other in real terms. 

They are the followers of Mohammed 
Or Krishna or Jesus or Buddha
They are taught with. 

They are the Abujahls of Muhammed's time. 

Abujahals and his interpreters rules the world ever, 

With respect to spirituality of absolute truth and God.

Without giving real access to real God and truth.