Nothing, But God as nothing

Dear all…..

One can read and understand.
One can read and not understand as well.
Both are equally right.
Both are unto their level.
None to be blamed.

If a person cannot like the taste
Of a particular food or fruit or subject or vision
It is his choice.
No one should be compelled or forced or blamed.

But,
Understanding may not,
And mostly will not,
Mean accepting it.

But if one cannot accept anything,
Which he could understand,
He should not say he could not understand.

Rather,
He can say he cannot accept for certain reasons,
For his own preconceived notions,
For his faith and belief.

He can consider, like he has,
Others also have their own….

It is not easy to understand.
It is agreed and any one has to agree.

Through out the history
There were
The defenders of what they believe.
(Be Abu Jahil (father of ignorant) or Pilatholse)

But, mostly, what happens is
They misunderstand.

And misunderstanding is equal to misconceiving.

Misconceiving
Will put both the mother and child
In danger.

That is why it is said
Not to say the things where it is not fit,
Or where it will be misconceived.

This could be the reason
Old India said not to say Veda in front of Shudras.
This was practiced afterwards wrongly….

And this could be the reason
Why Abu Huraira also was beaten on his face
Once by Omar (if true) for his saying in public
“Who ever say “There is no God, But God”
They enter Paradise”.

(And I am sure too that
One is in Paradise,
If and when really say
“There is no God, But God”
Nothing, but nothing as God....?)


To put some medicine, meant not for children,
In children’s reach is wrong (relatively).
It will kill the children.

And even if we put somewhere
Away from children’s reach,
But children come by themselves and take it
We will beat and punish such children
(Shudras in this case).
That is the punishment for their own welfare.

Hope
I too am not doing wrong (relatively)
Without knowing to whom I am talking all these

******************* *****************


At hearing
One knock at your door
You can decide,
Whether you really want to open
Or to put one more lock to your door.

If you really open your door,
Especially at both ends,
There doesn’t arise the case of debate.

You will just learn
In such a way
That nothing will be stuck in you,
But all will just pass by and through you
Giving you a breeze of comfort and solace.

If you want not to open the door
And, rather,
Want to strengthen your locking system
By putting one more lock,
(This happens mostly with believers of any faith blindly),
And if the other one continues
With his knocking at your doors,
The debate comes up
Creating more of noise pollution
(From the point of view of
The closed one and knocking one).

And you and the knocker
Will be surely be intolerant
And will happen to be violent too,
If at all the door happens to be open
Because of such a heavy knock or noise,
Towards each other…..

When you are closed
You can’t be other than intolerant and violent
To any knock and call
Be it for your good or bad
Be it from you friend or enemy.

Because you just happen to feel insecure
Towards any knock and call from outside
For your fear of getting opened,
To the infinity and absolute,
To get you lost of your presently availed
Finite and relative Security
Of /for being closed in a system or society or a group, faith
Strengthening such a society or system or group or faith.


********* *************

Finally I would say
Answers are taken,
Not given.
According to the level and kind of roots
You send down the earth.

The earth or soil
Doesn’t show or give
Fruits and flowers
In form, taste and color
The kind of seeds, plants and its roots
Take from it
Whatever the type they can.


With regards,


Raheem