We need to talk
common sense. Common sense will talk simple and clear, and actual and factual,
near which stays justice.
The courts and
judicial system of any country, unfortunately, if too much formalized and
proceduralized, will cause itself to be prolonged and distanced from the actual
and factual practical world of common sense and, hence, will not talk simple
and clear. Emulation and imitation, anywhere in the world, will discourage
original thoughts, inputs and creativity of common sense. This will happen
naturally in spite of all the sincere positive moves, efforts and attempts to
reform the system to make it more accessible to common public as more
interacting with common men and their reality. All such moves will give only an
illusory output of temporary relief and attention, with its inherent inability
to sustain and maintain it.
Creativity and
self-initiative need freedom and space. Judiciary has got this space and
freedom anywhere in the world. Still judiciary mostly lacks initiative and
creativity. Because, the initiative and creativity comes up from common sense
that originates and sprouts from life and its reality so as to support and help
life and its reality in return.
Easiest way to
do and render justice is to go with open and clear common sense. The truth and
justice stay near the common sense of common people in most of the cases.
Justice by common sense will not be complicated and will not need any further
interpretation or explanations or justifications for and after the
adjudication. But, our courts or judiciary seems to be not talking or
befriending justice and truth of common sense. They estrange themselves from
common sense and commonness to the extent that they do not know common man’s
tongue or the facts and realities surrounding common men. Judiciary behaves
like alien world in a different planet.
Just Ice
or just Vapors
Simplest thing
to do and deliver has to be doing and delivering justice. Justice delivered
will besimple like simple drinking water, easily and immediately drinkable to
quench immediate and normal thirst of common man in his daily life. Water is of
no use if it is given after the one in need is no more. Also, the same water of
justice can’t or won’t be drunk if given as ice or vapors. The justice get
frozen or evaporated due to the unnecessary and mostly artificially created
delay.
The fate of
justice delivered at distance or in delay will be only of just ice or vapors,
the frozen or evaporated form of justice. If judicial officers behave like
strangers, estranging and distancing from the common man and their affairs,
judicial processes will automatically get unwantedly delayed and distanced due
to formalities and procedures intended to familiarize such strange judicial
officer with the subjects in issue. So is the water of justice delivered by
majority judicial officers in present day Indian judiciary happens to like just
ice or vapors. Such justice has a look of unbreakable stones or untouchable air
which in no way will be felt by common Indian public as quenching their thirst
or meeting their quest for justice.
Just ice or just
vapors instead of justice, which too delivered after too much toiling with
money, energy and time. In most of the big cases where political leaders and
big financial allegations are involved, justice stands frozen or evaporated by
delay or distance, mostly intended and created to protect the vested interest
than genuine interest and feeling of common public for justice and the truth
seen by the naked eyes of common sense.
This kind of
justice or just vapors giving judicial system no way will harm or punish or
deter any of real criminals and culprits, players before and behind almost all
corruptions and crimes in India, from doing or repeating such crimes, offences
and corruptions. And these actual criminals, who easily get overseen and
acquitted by Judiciary due to lack of common sense, and by its tricks of
delaying and distancing, are actually leading our nation. They are the leaders
of almost all our national and regional political parties. Such criminals are
freely playing their game even in Judiciary, be their name is Chief Justice of
High Courts or Chief Justice of Supreme Court.
Common
sense settles better.
Common sense
sees solution and settlement near and clear. Because, it sees the problems and
its reasons near and clear. But our courts are unable to find the
solutions and settlement near and clear as our courts and judicial officers are
far away from common people and their affairs. The cases and disputes reach our
courts and judicial officers very delayed. Courts act and behave as if it is in
a distant protected world or planet, away from the facts and realities and
unaware of problems and its reasons. Hence, what common sense and common sight
of the common people can easily see or feel with their simple open naked eyes
and hearts, courts and judiciary do not(and are unable to)see or feel with
their microscopes and telescopes.
Longer the
time taken, lesser the chance for solution.
Cake should be
eaten when it is hot and fresh. But common Indian public has never been lucky
to eat the cake of justice until and unless it is old and rotten.
The Indian
common sense sees no reason for delay. Rather they feel longer the time for
solutions and settlements is taken, lesser is the chance for the same to be
solved and settled in right manner. Facts and evidences easily get forgotten or
destroyed by the passage of time. And this is what is happening and this
is what is facilitating the corrupt and criminals, including our great
political leaders, easily escape from the sight of courts on day to day basis.
Mostly, out of
helplessness, common Indian public are made to feel that the courts and
judiciary are in a way colluding with culprits and criminals, who are
politically and financially powerful, to help them escape and evade from the
punishments. The courts help them to use all loopholes of laws and procedures,
and facilitate for them the forgetting, tampering and destruction of evidences
by delaying and unnecessarily adjourning and formalizing and proceduralising
the justice delivery system.
The facts and
evidences, clear and near to common sense, which can easily lead to the
earlier, easier and faster solution and settlement of cases, are made to be
forgotten, destroyed and ignored. That too with the clear knowledge of common
sense, and even with the clear knowledge and sight of courts. Every clear and
near fact and evidence later on, as the time pass by, becomes a matter of doubt
and suspicion for the courts. This is where common public get exhausted of
their hope in judiciary.
Courts not
convinced, but common sense is.
Indian public
with their common sense is very clear about the acts and facts that take place
near to them. But the same common sense get embarrassed to see the courts are
not convinced of a simple clear matter and fact which common sense of common
people are easily convinced.
Common sense,
so, has a reason to doubt as to whether the courts and judicial officers lack
simple commons sense and common sight? They ask: is the main qualification of
our court system and our judicial officers to lose common sense and common
sight of very clear and apparent things and facts?
Answer to why
our courts and our judicial system lack and loss commons sense and common touch
are the reasons, as below, for denial and delay of justice.
Justice
denied better than delayed
“Justice delayed
is justice denied” was the proverb of the past reflecting the factual and
actual. When the courts and justice means opposite of common sense and common
sight, the new version of the same proverb to clearly depict the present day
reality and frustration of the common Indian public about the justice delivered
by Indian Judiciary and judicial system is “Justice denied is better than
Justice delayed”.
Denial is better
than delay. Denial is clear and direct. Denial done at once, straight forward,
will save tolling with time and money. It won’t cause piling up of unsettled
cases in courts. It can at least cause a feel of being denied which naturally
will call for protest and reaction. Such enlightened reactions and protests
will naturally compel the system to change by itself. Whereas, delaying is a
kind of distraction and drowsing. It is a kind of slow poisoning and getting
people lost of their interest and hope in justice. It will lead them to be
helplessly distanced from the whole judicial system and its intended result.
Denial with
delay, and the so-called delayed justice, is a burden in terms of money and
time. Neither the courts (with its judicial and extra judicial officers and
staff) nor the lawyers will ultimately suffer from delay or denial of justice.
It will feed the courts with lot of work piled up and it will satiate only the
appetite of lawyers for having long pending cases in their files. Those are the
reasons why both the lawyers and courts are least concerned of this delay or
denial issue. Both have no compulsory targets to meet. Delay or denial will not
cause starvation or poverty to them, but to the poor Indian public. Courts will
get paid in time by the government and the lawyers will get paid by the poor
common men irrespective of delaying or denying of justice and irrespective of
losing or winning of the cases. The ultimate sufferers are the common Indian
public who, by mistake or by default, happen to believe in Indian judicial
system, and in lawyers as their agents in courts, hoping and looking for
justice. So, due to their sheer frustration and helpless feel, the common
Indian public are getting compelled to say “Justice denied is
better than Justice delayed”.
Root cause
of delay and denial.
The main reason
for delay or denial of justice is that our judicial officers or judges in each
and every court are basically strangers to the court, cases, parties and place
where the disputes occur. They are also, in addition to their strange or alien
feel, without feel of compassion. So, being a stranger without love and
compassion, and without having the basic judicial ethic of urge to render
justice, they would lack the urge and interest to give speedy and immediate disposal
to the disputes. Further, due to his strangeness to the parties and the fact of
each different case, he would need more time to avail support from a
commissioner and/or a lawyer to get to know more details of each case. The cost
of lawyers and commissioners comes upon the poor clients. This is the delay and
cost due to the non-familiarity of judges with the place and parties.
Just because the judges are strangers and are not the persons from the
same place where the Court is located and where the disputes are occurring.
In earlier days,
a different kind of judicial system, which was not organized but effective, was
prevailing all over India. Such a judicial system did not incur any cost to run
the case or to present the dispute. Also it did not cause any delay in
delivering, be the justice sought was denied or delivered.
The reason was
very simple. Our old unorganized judicial set up and system was mainly
dependent on the selfless people who did not take up the job for salary or
selfish benefits. They were also from the same locality knowing each and every
one and thing in that locality. This made delivering and rendering of justice
easier and faster without needing to depend on selfish lawyers or commissioners
as middlemen parasites.
Our present day
judges happen to be in their position for their need for a job to earn their
own respected living means. Village leaders, who happened to be the judges in
the past, was the persons more acceptable and known to almost all in that
village, whereas a present day judge is not. If village leader was good,
everything he did was good. But, now, even if a judge, by mistake, happens to
be good (which is very much unlikely), everything he does can’t be good.
Because, our present day justice delivering system itself is delaying,
distancing and, hence, denying type. If a present day judicial officer or a
judge is not good or is corrupt, there is no way to replace or correct or warn
such a judicial officer. He will not be bound by any one upper or lower to him
or to his designation. No one can question or influence him in person, except
his own selfish interests. Even the appellate courts and higher judicial
officers cannot warn or correct or question him. At the maximum what an
appellate court can do is to come up with another opposing decree cancelling
lower court verdict. That too if the appellate court judge is such a
responsible one with good sense.
Main focus
of judicial officers.
Prime focus and
urge of our judicial officers are not on ensuring or rendering justice in right
time and mode. Rather they are more focused on making their own life safe,
secure and luxurious. They happen to be judicial officers not because of their
love for doing justice or because of their compassion. They become judges only
as part of their search for a better, respectable, safer and easier job that
can earn for them a respectable and luxurious living at the cost of others,
i.e. government service. They are like any other, doing their work like any
other do his work to earn living means.
Judicial
officers are keener about their status, salary, allowances and promotion. They
know that they won’t be salaried more or less for showing or for not showing
the compassion towards the common Indian public who approach them for justice.
They are not keen on becoming duty and conscious in delivering justice.
Lawyers-the worms and germs.
Mood of lawyers,
as the blood sucking intermediaries, also set reasons for delay. Lawyers sooth
and protect the judicial officers with their maximum, to get the reward favor
from the judicial officers, mostly to delay and adjourn the cases to their
convenience. Even when the basic judicial ethics wants the judicial officers to
be selfless in rendering, to be frank with the reality, it is a well-known fact
that all our judicial officer are self-centric and ego centric people to the
extent that they are only keen and strict about being respected by lawyers and
are very strict about being addressed in humble language and they easily get
disrespected or outraged (to use the provision of “contempt of court” against
such lawyers and parties) if in any way any lawyer or party in any way happen
to use, by the pressure of fact or time, the words “shall be” or “should be” in
addressing or praying to them instead of the words “may be”.
Lawyers don’t
wish to see the cases entrusted with them to finish very soon. They don’t mind
and complain about adverse effect of courts adjourning case hearing. Their main
focus is not on finishing and solving the disputes, but prolonging them to the
maximum so that they can milk more money as their fees. Each adjourning will
give them a chance for one more fee from their client, in different names. In
this way, Lawyers also are helping the lazy and inefficient judicial officers
and are contributing their share in pilling up of cases in courts. Lazy,
inefficient and impotent judicial officers in return help the lawyers to milk
money for a very long time even in simple minor case by adjourning and delaying
the justice delivering process.
Lawyers in our
court system handles the role of mosquitoes or worms or germs in the mud or
wound or dirt. They see each accident or dispute as a wound on which they can
settle to suck the blood or puss or dirt. They wish, plan and pray to worsen
and deepen the wounds and dirt, so that his role and his benefit will be higher
and longer. Both the commissioners and lawyers behave like parasites and burden
creeping on the poor layman clients who happen to approach court for whatever
reason and hope. Court adjourns a case for another day because of its
inefficiency or wrong planning or wrong scheduling. Courts also happen to
adjourn hearing of cases because of judicial officers sheer disinterest or
because of judicial officers’ assured feel of no loss or not affected due to such
adjournment, or the surety feel he has about his position. His salary will be
same or more and will be in time in his account. No one can oust him out from
what he is in.
Courts are the
dustbins or pits of dirt in and around which the worms and germs called lawyers
live, sustain and survive. Lawyers will never complain about the courts
and judicial officers or about the laziness or inefficiency of judicial
officers, even if they are found to be apparently unqualified, inefficient,
foolish and blind. Because, the inefficient, blind and senseless judicial
officer are the good omens for them to milk money. Such judicial officer will
not harm them or any of their interest. Such judicial officer will sow the
seeds for more cases and prolonged fees. Such judicial officers will harm only
the interest of the innocent and poor common public, the real victims. It is
not because all the judicial officers are good, compassionate and efficient in
delivering justice, there is no much complaint against them from lawyers and
bar council. But it is because lawyers are very much happy about impotent,
unqualified and inefficient judicial officers and about their ability to earn
more making these kinds of judicial officers and judicial system as an excuse
and cover.
Lawyers very
well know that there are lots and lots of foolish and senseless judicial
officers in all the courts all over India, who work as the judicial officer
without judicial conscience or duty consciousness and selflessness, but are
there in the courts just for earning their living and for ensuring their
allowances and promotions.
Even if any good
selfless lawyer happens to make any sound complaint against such useless
judicial officer, it won’t be heard in favor of such lawyer and no other lawyer
will support such a lawyer, fearing that the favor of such foolish and
senseless judicial officer will be lost. The selfless lawyers who want to serve
their clients will be cornered. Majority of lawyers’ prime focus is not on
quality of justice, but on quantity of their cases and its fees. They are
interested in piling up of cases in their office and in the courts.
Lawyers are keen
on creating reasons in front of courts to adjourn the case. They make sure they
are busy with other courts. Poor layman client will not know and will not
enquire why his case was adjourned. On the other side judicial officer’s
negligence or laziness is a prevailing factor for delay as his position will
not be in any way threatened.
Lawyers with
unaccounted black money
Lawyers’ money
from their practice is never accounted or audited, hence it is mostly never
taxed, except on the accounts and records lawyers voluntarily give to the
relevant departments for formality. There is no mechanism to ensure and make
lawyers accountable to the state and clients. Clients are not given any receipt
for the fee they pay. Lawyers never, and are never bound to, publish or
publicize their income to any authority. Hence, service to the clients
and tax for the money they amass get to be unguaranteed. Clients are unable to
go against the lawyers even if the lawyers do not deliver the service
justifying the amount they are paid. There is no proof for such fees ‘payments
and there is no compulsory receipt system supervised by the courts strictly.
Hence, the money amassed by the lawyers automatically become unaccounted and
unrecorded and thereby non-taxable.
The concerned
government agency, like income tax department, are keeping a blind eye on a big
money amassing group of lawyers, like they are towards politicians, all over
the country. Any amount that is not accounted or audited are not taxed too,
hence is black. So, lawyers become the first party in keeping the unaccounted
black money. That too in front of the open eyes of the courts in India that is
responsible to see the country’s rules and laws are in strict compliance.
Who will account
and record lawyers and their income? What and who will prevent lawyers from
misguiding and exploiting their clients with unaffordable fees? We hear, and
say very boastingly the stories, about big fees charged by big lawyers. Such
big lawyers charge for their minutes and seconds in lakhs and millions. There
is no mechanism to properly track and account this money and tax it
appropriately. Unless there is any mechanism to track this money dealing and
amassing by lawyers all over the country, all the lawyers in India will have to
be considered as the black money hoarders and keepers, playing and working as a
big criminal threat against the main stream India’s white money economy.
How can lawyers’
service quality be measured and ensured especially to worth the money they get
from their clients? Is there any proper and working mechanism to register the
clients’ complaints against lawyers? What kind of corrective forces and
measures are there against lawyers? Lawyers and judicial officers are like
crows. They can eat flesh of all, and no one can eat their flesh.
Courts are for
lawyers only as a trapping net to trap and catch their clients. Courts cannot
correct lawyers, but facilitate to play their tricks and spread their net. Our
court system corrupts both the lawyers and judicial officers, at the cost of
public money. Lawyers go as stray dogs unaccounted and undisciplined.
A mechanism,
than bar council of India, should be created to protect and monitor lawyers.
Lawyers should be accountable and responsible for financial dealings, income
and dealing with black money mafias and criminals. The fact that lawyers’ job
is the most unsecure and unguaranteed job, disabling them to be working as
practicing lawyers outside their country, should not be a ground for them to
get an easy walk in teaming up with criminals and mafias to play antinational
game of amassing as much black money as possible. Unless their incomes are
accounted, all their money and wealth should be considered as black. Lawyers
become black money hoarders, helping the other hoarders to hide behind them.
The black money amassing by lawyers starts and happens in the eyes the court
and judicial system, relentlessly.
If the lawyers’
fee and financial dealings can be monitored, automatically the clients getting
cheated and justice getting delayed there by also can be avoided. Lawyers can
be held responsible for their money in front of both the clients and state.
Crippled
Appellate system
In present day
India, each judicial officer is becoming so foolishly arrogant. Their arrogance
does not allow them to go for the merit of the case. They give any kind of
decree on their whims and fancies. For giving a wrong judgment on any case, intentionally
disregarding the merit and fact of the case, such a judge can’t be and won’t be
punished or penalized. Not even a negative remarks or warning on such judicial
officers can be made by appellate courts judges.
Incompetent
Judges
There are
hundreds of instances where judicial officers are underqualified to comprehend
the subject matters properly and to accommodate the people with tolerance and
compassion. Hundreds of such judicial officers can be seen all over India.
Their only qualification is that they are appointed as judges. Their
disqualification and ignorance helps only to strengthen their arrogance of
being appointed as judicial officers. They simply disregard the aspects of
equity and natural justice. As for them they are the ultimate authority. They
can’t be questioned either by lawyers or by the appellate courts. Even if there
are appellate courts above them, such appellate courts at the maximum may come
up with a different verdict, but cannot and will not do anything against lower
court judicial officer. Such appellate courts can’t punish or warn lower court
judicial officers. There will not be or there cannot even be a negative remark
on the lower court judicial officer’s negligence or disregard or fault or
collusion with the vested interest. There is no such mechanism with our court
system to penalize such judicial officers, if they are found to be blindly and
willfully wrong in giving a verdict fully disregarding the facts and evidences.
Contempt
of court – Damocles’ Sword.
The word contempt
of court has become a sword that cuts the throat of freedom of speech and
thought. Court stand as the entity that cannot be questioned and corrected.
There is no way by which a judicial officer, even if he is utterly and
intentionally false and malafide in delivering justice throughout. Even the
appellate court cannot warn or criticize or correct him. Maximum the appellate
court can do is to come up with another verdict different from the one given by
the lower court, that too if the judicial officer by mistake become a person of
duty consciousness and justice delivering.
Trade or
service unions of judicial officers
All the sectors
in India are ruled and controlled by trade unions and service unions, which
means all are directly or indirectly controlled and managed by dirty games of
our politicians and political parties. That is the very reason why bureaucracy,
ruled, protected and controlled by trade unions of political parties, every
time sides with political parties and its leaders in their crisis to protect
them when any corruption case or allegations comes up against such political
parties and its leaders. Written rules and bye-laws of such registered trade
unions, in reward, extravagantly saves all the servants and employees in all
such public and private sector. It focuses only on the rights of servants and
employees and disregards unproductivity and irresponsible behavior of servants
and employees. It also disregards the rights and helplessness of poor common
public against such servants and employees. The employees and servants in
public sector reward back by colluding with the concerned politicians and
political parties in case of any problem or corruption allegation against its
leaders and activists, ministers or MLAs or MPs.
Also, here
practically happens, very embarrassingly, the formation of unwritten laws,
rules and byelaws of unwritten and unregistered trade unions for political
parties and judiciary, among them, to protect the political parties and
judicial officers each other.
Except for formally
and for meaninglessly raising allegation against opposing parties and its
leader to canvass the vote banks, no political parties and leaders in India
have ever been hitherto really sincere to pursue and see any corrupt political
leader is convicted or booked for justice, unless they really want to scapegoat
someone who, they think, are really incapable and unqualified to be a political
leader, that too to save the political industry, their playground.
All the
political parties and their leaders equally know as in day light that all the
leaders in all political parties are equally naked and corrupt and they equally
understand and take it as their duty to protect each other so as to save and
protect their very playground of political industry and trade (with its
employees of politicians and political leaders). They collude each other not to
damage and destroy the very political industry, by protecting each other
without major damage or shit on their bodies.
The same thing
of collusion to protect judicial industry and its employees of judicial
officers happens in judicial field also. Judicial system in has India has also
developed a kind of unwritten trade or service unionism to protect judicial
officers by themselves. Supreme Court is leading this move to ensure its
children of high courts and lower courts are sufficiently protected, and they
are given enough space to collude and save each other. Supreme Court has
ordered recently to protect and not to criticize lower court judicial officers
even if they are found to be at clear fault of not rendering justice or
colluding or becoming negligent, biased and selfish.
Supreme Court
with its recent ruling has strengthened this tendency of trade or service
unionism and collusion among judicial officers. By giving this kind of a ruling
Supreme court is ensuring that no superior or appellate judicial officer should
make any criticizing or negative remarks on below ranked lower court judicial
officer even if such lower court judicial officers are found to be wrong,
inefficient or biased in delivering justice or willfully at fault in
comprehending the disputes and formulating his decision and its reasoning.
Judicial officers are conveniently helped by Supreme Court to forget the basic
tenets and conditions of judicial ethics, i.e. to be selfless, unbiased and to
have urge to render justice.
Collegium
system and appointment of near and dear.
From the fact
who are the people appointed as judicial officers all over India hitherto, we
can easily come to know those are and were, hitherto, one or other way dear,
near and relative of the sitting or retired judges. The collegium system, at
the maximum, may ensure that conditions of reservation are met, that too by
appointing the near and dear of the sitting or retired judges of reserved
communities. Beyond that all the appointments to the luxury living of judiciary
are made very arbitrarily, making sure they are kin and kith of sitting or
retried judicial officers. This is the convenience our judicial officers have
availed when the appointments are done by collegium system. That is how
unqualified and inefficient and senseless judicial officers who lack urge to
render justice and selflessness by default happen to be the judicial officers
of our courts.
Feel of
once appointed, appointed forever.
Once a convict
is always convict was another old proverb. But in relation to the work or job
in public sector, this proverb needs to be re-read. Once selected is always
selected. That is the story of appointments in public sector. Once appointed;
appointed forever. Irrespective of government’s or country’s becoming poor,
people starving, public sector employees’ salary will go up every year. Govt.
sector is the only sector where job and its benefits are not dependent on loss
and profit or productivity and creativity.
In spite of
India being a country with highest unemployment rate, where unemployed
qualified people brutally outnumber the employed people and where more
qualified people are in waiting queue of unemployment, the appointments in
public sector are done for ever.
This feel of
appointment and selection for ever is the main reason that makes any government
employee, including our judicial officers, lazy, irresponsible, foolish and
arrogant as they find themselves unquestionable and un-oustable in their post.
It is also natural for them to lose their urge and want for improvement as they
feel they are appointed forever, except for their selfish interest of further
promotional changes. Once appointed, they won’t find any further reason to
maintain in them any kind of soft feeling of loyalty and sincerity, except for
their own growth, promotion, luxurious facilities and allowances, the way they
understand it. So, this newly formulated proverb ‘once selected, is always
selected’ and once appointed is always appointed is also one of the many main
reasons for losing and lacking interest in work and to finish the works
assigned as fast as possible.
Once appointed
should not mean they are appointed forever. The comfort feel of being appointed
forever and assurance of getting pension thereafter will make any one
stubbornly arrogant, wanting no further initiative, improvement, creativity,
sincerity. They will have a feel that they don’t want any further fuelling with
any new kind of fuels to keep them running and staying safe in the post. Such a
feel of appointment for ever and getting pension till life after death should
be deleted from government files.
So, in order to
make our govt. employees and judicial officers really responsible, creative,
progressive, improving and accountable, we need to rethink about appointment
made for ever. There should be a scope and area for evaluation and revaluation
of appointments made in any govt. sector, like it is in private sector. Each
posting or appointment has not to be forever, but only for few years (i.e. for
5 or 6 years), which may further be extended for further five or six years
subject to objective evaluation based on service record, creativity in service,
other factors and subject to another test with other unemployed qualified and
job seeking candidates for the same post.
If so, the
judicial officers and all the bureaucrats will become responsible, working to
meet the targets, trying to improve their skill and trying to update with the
latest. They will have the content of fear filled with sincerity in their
service. The reminder of being appointed only for five years, reminder of
getting reappointed on conditions, will work as a sword of Damocles above their
head. It will also remind them that they are living at the cost of public money
for which everyone on this country is an owner. Finally they will
reminded that there are millions outside as more qualified than them or equally
qualified like them to handle their posts and positions, who could not get into
the sector and their position only for the reason of luck factor.
Email: ilhamraheem@google.com
.jpg)