WHY TARGETING BRAHMINS AND CASTE SYSTEM, AND NOT POLITICAL ISLAM OF EXCLUSIVITY THEORY AND PHILOSOPHY OF INTOLERANCE?

We have to be frank
And, at least, have to see and know that
To be spiritual, to seek truth and God
And to be one with truth and God
There are no barriers or particular path
And religions are least required.

Denying religions should not mean
Denying God or not seeking truth and God.

Rather, it is the religions that deny
The real truth and real God
Obstructing the sight of
Real all encompassing truth and God
Putting covers of faith and blindness
On the eyes of seekers
Precluding them from further seeking
On their own feet on their own way.

********** **********

Mohammed could be a person different
From what we perceive of him today.
A mystic, a spiritual, a visionary, a great soul.
The truth could flow from him too
Like it can/could flow any time from any one
And from any such mystic, spiritual, visionary and great soul.

But politicized Islam and Islam created by politics
Has a different look and outlook.
It wanted only Islam to remain as the one and only way and faith.
It claims its exclusivity and finality to represent and preach God and truth.
It reiterates that no one can come to talk truth after Mohammed.
All others, after Mohammed, have just to follow and interpret him.
It considers itself as the only one religion of only one God
And Mohammed as the last and final to spell truth.
Hence, it has the authoritarian and totalitarian tone,
Instilled with ideology of intolerance and inability to co-exist with others,
To say and see all other religions, paths and ways are wrong
And are that of leading to wrong and hell.

********** **********

Arabs happened to get one. Only one.
Nothing before or after that one.
Unlike India or China or Greece.
Embarrassed or overwhelmed in such a situation,
And with ignorance (or pretending ignorance) of the past and other parts of the world,
They thought that one can be the maximum
And nothing can (or need to) come beyond that one.

But they did not want to answer why Quran,
Which they considered as the last and complete,
Could not represent more than 75% of the worlds?
And, even when they claimed the book of Quran
As the last one from the last prophet,
They could not explain why it was not made to be a complete book
While Mohammed was alive
And why it was compiled only after 20 years of his death?

********** **********

Truth and God can be sought and found
Through any path and direction, including Islam.
No need to exclude Islam only,
If the seekers are really sincere to their seeking.

Except for the case,
In their search to enjoy the real fruit
They will have to peal off the skins and covers
That carried the name of religions of Islam or any other.

*************** ***********

So, here
Don’t you think this exclusivity claim of Islam was
Only a part of Arab politics and part of Arab nationalism and culture?

Otherwise, why should they make it compulsory
Even the prayers to be in Arabic language
And by turning towards Mekkah/Kaaba in Arabian land?
Was it because God is/was confined
To the language of Arabic and the direction Mekkah/Kaaba?
Or was it not just politically organizes the people under one and only form?

********* ***************
Mohammed is our master,
Among many thousands of masters
Who have gone by and who are yet to go by.

Politicized Islam and Islam created by politics
Shows and depicts to us a Mohammed,
Who is confused, tensioning and fearing,
Whereby he needs all Muslims compulsorily pray for him,
As the integral part of all their prayer.

It doesn’t give us a picture of an emancipated soul.

It gives us a picture of a business person giving more and more of
Offers and schemes in the name of God
To get him and his God marketed
And asking the followers to wage wars for him and his God
In their effort to market and advertise him and his god.

And in this way, while waging war claiming superiority,
Politicized Islam and Islam created by politics
Do not consider all the humans as equal and one,
Unless they comes under one fold and umbrella of Islam.

The politicized and politics created Islam and Quran very clearly states
“Pagans/polytheists are dirty (untouchable)” (Quran).

As per this Islam and Quran,
A Muslim can’t eat food of/with pagans/polytheists,
Can’t stay with a pagans/polytheists,
Can’t marry pagans and polytheists,
Can’t co-exist with pagans and polytheists.

So, is a Muslim asked to wage war against pagans and polytheists,
Unless or until they convert to the fold of Islam.

*******************

If so, why do the Islamists and Muslims talk against
Caste system and Brahmin supremacy?

It is easily understandable that caste system was
Wrongly implemented and interpreted.
But was never based on faith, but practice.
Practice of strict work-force distribution.

Division of labor was based on the fact that
There were different sectors of labors to be attended.

Brahmin never waged war against any one,
Except for the social set up of the time wanted them
To follow caste system as a method of work force distribution.

Rather, India was mostly attacked, looted and occupied.
Just for the passivity of Indian nation
Due to their great vision "all are equally true"

************* *********

At least we need to know that it was the same Brahmin living India
That allowed Islam and Christianity and all other religions
To enter into India and propagate freely.

Whereas, any country where Islam have entered,
Islam Has obliterated such countries’ past memories,
Cultural and civilization heritages and landmarks,
Including their way of life, language and customs.

Can you imagine of the real muslims who ask
A Muslim country to be perfectly secular?

************* ********

You made it your habit,
Like you are in your rituals,
To do without applying your conscience,
To follow without being convinced,
By giving your head and tongue to others’
Thoughts and dictations.
Imitating just physically, repeating just by tongue,
Spelling what others are/were spelling
To the extend that your prayer,
Its timing, mode, content and language are and will be
As decided and dictated by such others of past.

That is why all your prayers are, to you,
Tiring and exhausting.
Never spontaneously flowing.

So, is your way of putting blame on others too.

********** ********* ********

Caste system was an old day social set-up,
Made to be based on certain kind of faith in later stage.

Like the present day social set-up has become the way it is today
Because of its certain kind of faith suiting to this time.

Unlike the conspiracy theory says or try or want to put it.

It was not because of concerted conspiracy,
The Brahmins were exploiting anyone.

Brahmins of ancient period never convened a meeting,
Like the proponents of conspiracy theory want us to understand,
To conspire against the humanity and lower classes,
Like it happens with the present day political parties and religious organizations.

Brahmins were the leaders of that time.
Just because they deserved to be so,
Because of their Brahma jnan (knowledge of the whole).

Kshatriyas were warrior
Who readied themselves to face the challenge of fighting and wars.

Automatically, like even in present modern system,
Leaders enjoyed certain facilities and luxuries.

Any one who start enjoying certain security and luxury
Wanted and would need, in any time through out the history till date,
To keep it continuing.

Even our present day political and religious parties
And its leaders want and try to do so.

Political or social or religious organizations
And its leaders of all time had and have now
An easy walk in their life at the cost of others.

Bureaucrats as well have this easy walk in their life at the cost of public.

Leaders anywhere throughout the history, till today,
Have been enjoying special status.

In old days it was Brahmin as the priests and leaders.
Kshatriya as well, the warriors, were the leaders.
But with their claimed the jnana (knowledge) of brahma (the whole)
And well preparedness to fight and face the threats.

Present day priests or Brahmins
(call them Political or religious parties and leaders)
Enjoy and waste more than what
The real Brahmins of past were (blamed to be) enjoying.


Any group or an organization will have its leaders.
Any party or its leaders will live at the cost of public.
In old time Brahmins were these leaders.
You may call these priests in the present day terms
As political or religious leaders or political or religious parties.

********* ********** *********

If so,
Why should we put the blame only on Brahmins of old time?

It is very easy to put blame, targeting any old group ,
Like it is done in any and every conspiracy theory….
On day to day basis.

***********

Let us ask one very simple question…?
What do we think about the present day political parties, leader and bureaucrat.?
Is not the major share of nation's wealth spent and looted by these groups?
Is it because they are Brahmins…?
What does this mean…?
It is necessary to be a Brahmin to be corrupt
And to cause looting and wasting of wealth?
Also doesn’t it means that it is not necessarily the Brahmins,
To cause looting and wasting of wealth of nation?

Historically how many Brahmins are and were there to show….?
If at all Brahmins caused, as what you call the wastage of wealth ,
Was it not done by individual Brahmins, as any other human being?
Rather, was it because the faith and belief of Brahmanism of that time
Asked to do the same?


If so, why same is still continuing…..?

The same faith and belief, different way, causes waste of wealth in present day…

When we waste public wealth to build Masjids and churches
In each and every corners of our country, what does it mean?
Doesn’t the same cause wasting of public wealth?

True, you will have an argument, it is a matter of faith.

And Brahmin, as a concept also was a matter of a faith of that social set-up of that time.

Why should we take double standard for our leaders and Brahmins?

Brahmins were priests or leaders as well.

Without priests/leader no one had a group or an organization or a party.
Whether you name them as priests or leader, it is only a matter of your choice.

Were the Arab rulers and royal families,
Who wasted a lot and lot, Brahmins?
Were King Fahad, Bin Ali, Saddam, and Gaddafi, and many others…. Brahmins?

Were A Raja and Kani Mozhi and Bangarappa Brahmins?

Any group/leader in and around the power causes looting and spending of nation’s wealth.

It is not because one was Brahmin and other was not.

So, there is nothing and no ground for the Brahmins only to be blamed
As per the conspiracy theory, post-hatched to suit one’s need and interest.


*************** *********

Can you see one simple example of
Obliteration by Brahmins.

Nowhere. Never.

Rather it was their openness
and their belief "all ways are equally true"
That made India welcome all other religions.
And India has thereby cradled all diverse visions and philosophies.

Because Brahmins, unlike other leaders, were
Knowledgeable people of high vision and spirituality.
Mostly sincere to the core.
Seeing no difference between the faiths and approaches.

Only exception to this could be said
The so-called obliteration of Buddhism and Jainism.

But Buddhism and Jainism was nothing but
Clear, real and different interpretation or off-shoot of
Brahmanic and Hindu concept and faith of God and Universe.

That is why India is still continuing to be
With all religions of the world and with all its braches,
Improvised and nor-improvised versions,
With all its memories and monuments kept intact.

********** **********

Take the case the countries where Islam entered.
Did not Islam completely destroy and obliterate
All the footprints, cultural heritages and historical signs,
Language and customs and beliefs of all those great civilizations
Like that of Egypt, Palestine, Iraq, Turkey, etc…..?

Also, take the case of the countries where Muslims have majority.
witll the real muslims there want a secular system
And would they welcome other religions and visions
To be easily propogated therein, like it is happening in India now,
And like it was happening in India before?

Islam’s claim of truth’s oneness and Islam's exclusivity and finality claim,
Will not (or cannot) allow Muslims to accommodate and tolerate
Any other beliefs, culture, and customs as equally right/true
And will not allow them to co-exist with the other faiths and paths, therby.

Kaaba, as understood by even Muslims,
Was a temple with more than 360 idols.

What did they do with it?

Did they keep any of them, even as the remnants of old culture or faith?

They destroyed them all to make Kaaba to the kind of a worshipping place
Suiting to their faith and philosophy.
Philosophy of intolerance.