If fatherlessness is itself just hooliganism, for them It is indeed a fatherless party (group) matching

If fatherlessness is itself just hooliganism,

If fatherlessness is shown to be hooliganism,

Then good for those who carry around such fatherlessness:

It is indeed a fatherless party (group).

It is indeed an unregistered party (group).

It is indeed a party (group) that has given birth to a bunch of parties and taken paternity for none of them.

The many fatherless-rioting parties born to such a fatherless “father” (group) are indeed the same.

It is the party (group) that pulls off every dirty trick, sows trouble all over the country, and stands taking responsibility for nothing.

It is the very party that commits every theft and violence from behind, gets others to commit them, and then pins the blame on others.

Let it also be said clearly, alongside this:

Fatherlessness alone is not a disqualification.

No one is born of two fathers either.

So calling people “fatherless,” or considering them born of two or more fathers, is itself misogynistic and inhuman.

No one is born fatherless by choice, nor born of two fathers.

Anyone we wrongly label “fatherless” — or anyone who is actually fatherless — did not choose either their father(s) or their fatherlessness at birth.

Therefore, fatherlessness is only helplessness, only a tragedy of circumstance —

one born into fatherlessness has no part in that fatherlessness.