Sun is same while rising and setting - Through you and your life.

Lived a lot
Looking at others...
Thinking they would know more
And would have something more
That we don’t know and understand
About everything and life….

Now in our old age,
We see people all looking at us,
Thinking we would know more
And would have with us something more
That they don’t know and understand
About everything and life….

Sun is same
While rising and setting.
And same is the sun
In the middle at mid noon.

***************
“Do you mean to say that I have to do
Propagation and marketing for you?

Question is to God.

Since no answer came to me from God till now,
The answer mine is,

“No,
Rather I would need him
To let me more closer to him
To know him more
And to touch and be touched by him more
Than expecting me to do for him
Propagation and marketing”

Life is the meaning for God.
Every one is living God
Knowing and touching God
While they live their life normal.

Therefore, God is, even otherwise,
Propagated and marketed

Through me and my life.

And through you and your life.

Normally.

GOD EQUAL TO GODS AND GODDESSES - POLYTHEISM EQUAL TO MONOTHEISM

My son,
God and truth are commons senses.
Like the common senses vary from person to person
From species to species
God and truth also vary its form, color and content.
Like the form and flavor/taste of fruits and flowers.

Let each one choose the taste, color and form of his own.
The choices are by the tongue, eyes or noses or ears.
Ultimately what will be availed in, made use and absorbed in, is
The colorless, formless and tasteless or flavorless.

*******************

My son,
The question shouldn’t be
Whether one believes or disbelieves
Or whether, in his belief, one is a monotheist or a polytheist
Or whether he worships God or worships not
Or whether he is worshipping with or without idols or symbols.

My son,
The real question should be
Whether one really does and means
Whatever he does and talks.

If one does so,
Whatever be the way
And whichever be the directions, languages and means,
In and with him is God,
Even if he is an atheist.

**************

My son,
To have many gods of different function
Doesn’t or will not mean
There are partners to the supreme entity,
Called OM or Allah or Parbrahma or Paramehswara.

Many is, in culmination, one.
And in one there are many.

My son,
All the angels, one believes in, are
Gods of different specific functions,
From which he (or you) cannot exclude even him (you).

My son,
Is there any one as monotheist?
Or has any one to be compulsorily a monotheist?
Or can any one be a pure monotheist?
Or is God functioning this Universe by himself alone,
Without involving other angels or gods or you?
Or are not the others and their hands God only,
Including you, me, angels and devils,
Through whom God functions this universe?

No.
No one is here as a monotheist,
And no one has not to be compulsorily a monotheist.
No one can here be only a monotheist.

Claims are only claims, not the flames.

This universality is functioning
Involving all the other angels or gods or you of God’s making.

You are part of this universality
And are part in the making of this universality.

You are part of God
And are part in the making of God.

So, in this way, my son, why one has to be
Only a monotheist or a polytheist to be a believer?
Why can’t a disbeliever be a believer too?
Why one believer can’t be a disbeliever too?

My son,
Don’t think of a God ever concerned of
How do you take, or believe in, him.

God is there in the way you imagine of him.
God is there in all the forms of your guesses about him.

My son,
All are equally polytheists
And there is nothing wrong in being called a polytheist,
Nor in being called a monotheist.

Neither is wrong as such.
Neither is right as such.
Both are equally right and wrong.

My son,
God is not there to think how he is taken and believed;

Rather, mind yourself as to
Whether you mean what you do mean
Whether you do what do you do
Where you talk what you do talk.

My son,
God is God,
With and without you,
Before and after you.

So, God never depends on any
To solve his identity crisis.
And don’t ever try to depict a God of
Identity crisis and inner conflict or friction.

My son,
The so-called monotheists also
Give a lot of attributes to God.

Those different attributes, when given form, are
Different idols or symbols.
Different Gods of different qualities or functions.

So, why one should be called a polytheist whereas the other is not?
My son, no monotheist is here without being a polytheist too?

My son,
One can have different figures.
A figure of a person of him in himself,
Even when taken differently by different people at the same time.

My son,
One is a brother, a father, a son, a friend, a stranger, an enemy, an employees, etc….
But, meanwhile, he is only one.
One is able to perform all the roles towards different people.
So, in the same time, one can be in many and be representing as many.

It is the entitlement of the people around him
How to take him,
Whereby there will come into being of many “him”

My son,
Even otherwise,
There is no monotheist who does not believe in angels.
Even according to them, angels are
The agents to whom powers of god are delegated.
The agent by which God made this universe into being and functioning.

My son,
The would mean
God is working through others than him.
Through others’ than his own.
Or God is making all the hands, including ours,
His own hands.
Or all, what we consider, other than him
Are only him or part of him.

My son,
To say so, what does it mean?
God is the one who is walking and working
Be it through you or any one or what you call an angel or deva.

In relation to a Cow,
God is reaching to its need
Through you or through any one who cares for it.

So, accordingly, a cow will pray to him.
Or its prayer will lead by itself to him.
To you or any one who cares for it.

It will pray to the one who cares for it.

Neither because it denies the real God
Nor because it is not a monotheist.

It is praying to the one who care for it,
Is equal to praying to God.

Just because, God works and walks through you or him
As the one who cares for the cow.

That is how all the universalities
And your world in it are created and designed

That is how God has designed
Even Mercedes car, Boeing flights.

Through you, giving you a feel of you and yours.

That is how parents are made and considered gods
To their children.

By reaching their parents
Children can reach their God.

Worshipping their parents
They can worship their God.

Just because
God reaches to the children
In the form of their parents.

That is how teachers are considered as Gods

God reaches to the children
In the form of their teachers

That is how spouses are considered,
To and by each other,
God and goddesses.

God is reaching to each of them
In the form and way they need.

Both as god and Goddess
Giving form and design to the whole Universality.
As mixture and meeting of opposites.

That is why and how
God did not want to show him
Beyond this rule.

That is how and why Brahma and Saraswathy.
That is how and why Shiva and Parvathy
That is how and why Vishnu and Lakshmi.

Equal is God and goddess, in their role.
One to sustain and other to support.
Perfection and oneness is their mutuality.

My son,
Devas also are not different.

They are the angels, the one who is delegated.

They are the agents, with delegated powers of and from God.

Praying to them is equal to praying to God.

Especially as they are the delegated ones by God,
Even as the Semitic religions conceive them.

As per Semitic religions too, my son,
There are billions and billions of angels.

Each angel is delegated with powers of each aspect of universality.

So, has come the concept of billions and billions of gods and goddesses too
In the same way, but with different names,
Including that of me and you.

*************

My son,
If I deny God,
You would say
I am a denier, hence an atheist.

But God is because God is;
Not because I am a theist.

Not because
I believe or deny him.

Then, why this much of worries
About and for God?
Especially if he doesn’t need any one for his support.

Then, why should you depict your God
As helpless and desperate…?
Then, why should you depict your God
As needing much more customers…?
Then, why should you depict your God
Of doing some business of selfish interest?
Then, why should you depict your God
As needing your support to market him?
Then, why should you depict your God
As failing in his marketing strategy
With all these marketing efforts?

Then, why should you put God,
Whom you consider almighty,
As ever failing and as ever demanding?

**********

And, my son,
If I believe only in God as well,
You will tell me that
I am not a believer or a theist as well.

You want me to believe half in God
Or only in half God.

Or you want me to believe that
God is only half.

You want me to believe
Not only in God
But in many other power centers and entities too.

You want me to believe in devils
Saying devil is different from God
And meaning devil is another god
In his/its own sphere of work.

******************

Those who say
There is devil as opposed to God,
They are prophets of Devils too.

Isn’t it so…?

They want devils,
More than God,
To create and pass
Orders and revelations
In the name of, on behalf of, God.

So their verses are
Devils verses too.

The real Satanic Verses.

Their scriptures are
The scriptures that got revealed
Because of Devil,
And mostly from devil.
The devil that never existed
Except in their own forms and fancies.
(Min al Jinnath and Wa nnaas)

So, what is a devil?
Especially according to those who preach
And as per our own common logic.

God is the one who doesn’t have
An identity crisis.

Never needing to prove him
Before his own creatures
Or his own different forms.

Then, why should God need to
Create and pass orders
When only he is there
And no one is there to contest him?

*************
Do you want me to feel and believe
Creatures have separate independent existence and entity.

OK, agreed.

Going that way
If I happen to tell you that
Each one is a Deva (like devil is in his sphere) in his own sphere
You will start to disagree as well.

Helplessness in either case.

That is why I would answer you,
When you ask me, that
God is only God
And only God remains.

When there is only God
It would mean that
God is equal to no-God
And no-God is equal to God.

That is the meaning of
“There is no God, But God.”
Like no color becoming a color by itself.
Be it black or white….

*************

If only God, then
How there can be anything
Than God or than that of God?

So, everything and every one is divine.
Or otherwise,
No one and nothing is divine.

If there is only God
So, no need of an extra command from God
To be implemented/injected artificially,
That too, with the support of one of his creation or image.

Whatever God wills, happens.

Whatever God doesn’t will, doesn’t’ happen.

(Maa shaa’a Allahu Kaan, Wa maa lam yasha’a lam yakun)

*************

If Qur’an was the intention of Mohammed
As the last ever Divine book revealed
He would have got it completed and compiled
During his life time,
And before his death.
Especially if there was a claim from him
That it is/was the last book
And he is/was the last prophet.

But Mohammed was a real mystic
Not to consider and say about God
To be talking only to him,
To have stopped such talks,
And to send down any book as the last book
And to claim as he is the last prophet.

No mystic person
Can or will ever claim any kind of exclusivity
To and from God
And wouldn’t claim for himself
To be the last and final one
To talk the truth.

It was the need of post Mohammed politics
And its governance,
To have such a book,
As the last book,
So as no one would question them
With a different view, beyond that.

And that was the message
In making Mohammed
As the last Prophet as well
Through the same book.

Qur’an was compiled into complete book,
As of today’s Qu’ran,
At least after 15-20 years after Mohammed.


A mystic mind can’t be thinking and brooding over
Making only him and his word as the last and final,
Except political dictators and totalitarians.

Mystic mind, which becomes really free of all bridles,
Do not say or think of full-stops
Or confining and limiting God to
Any time, person, language or region.

For him God is all encompassing and all-accommodating
Who can be in any form, but in no specific form.
Who can be heard and be heard in any language,
But not necessarily only with a specific language.

NOTHING WRONG WITH IDOLS AND IDOLATORS

My son,
If God is God,

Both negative and positive are in God.
As the same God

Both devil and God are in him,
As the same God.

My son,
If it is not easy for any (relative) to reach God (the absolute),
Or to have a feel of reaching God,
Even though God is everywhere near,
In and around any and all,

Then, please know, my son,
It is for God (the absolute) very easy to reach you,
The way you imagine about him,
The place where you want him to be.

My son,
God is there where you imagine for him.
God is there in the way you imagine about him.
God is in all the forms and expressions
You, helplessly or helpfully, want him to be in.

My son,
Don’t be so eager to attribute an allegation on God
To say that God can’t reach Everyone everywhere.

So, my son,
In idols too….

Idols are just like any name you give to God.
Just some other form of expression about God
With some other means than language.

My son,
Even the names given to God,
As “God” or “almighty” or “merciful”
Are idols/symbols made in and with letters in languages.

Those are the means or efforts of
Addressing or understanding God,
Done helplessly or helpfully,
To express with certain attributes or qualities.

My son,
Names are expression with letters,
Idols are expression with elements/materials
And paintings are expression with colors

Names are shaped with letters,
Idols are shaped with materials
And pictures shaped with colors.

All, helplessly or helpfully,
With knowledge or ignorance,
To give the same meaning.

All to mean the same God.

All equally to qualify,
Or to detail or express
One or other quality or aspect of God,

As per one’s own imagination
Of and about God.

My son,
God can be put in any other form as well,
If he can be put in forms of names,
To detail his qualities
Or to have feel of getting in touch of him
Or to address him.

God can be put in colors as well,
If he can be put in letters.

My son,
As per all your religions,
Well-accepted it is
That God is omnipresent.

Then why, my son,
He can’t reach and be present
In the idols too?

Does or will God need to deny him to you
Just because you want him to be seen
The way you can imagine about him,
Helpfully or helplessly,
With knowledge or ignorance?

Rather, My son,
Won’t God love
Such all small efforts and its creations
Made out of your helpfulness of helplessness.

My son,
At least, who will say or claim that
Such your imaginations and innovations
Make loss or damage to God?

My son,
If God can be heard through his words
Of languages of our talk,
As, said to be, Qur’an or bible is claimed to be,
Then why can’t he be seen and viewed
In the forms we see and understand?

If he can be heard,
It is equally believable,
He can be seen as well.

If he can be put in names
It is equally believable that
He can be put in forms of idols as well.

Words and names are just symbols
Like Idols.

Idols also are, and for, the same.

To attribute or express
Certain qualities of one’s imagination,
Which is done same way by the names as well.

My son,
If god is the one who is
Undefined and unconfined,
And who cannot be defined and confined as well,
That should mean that
He can be in and with all forms and names
Without limiting him to be
Only in any particular form and name
Or formless or nameless state.

****************

My son,
It is not God who cannot tolerate and accommodate,
It is not God, who cannot reach all,
It is not God, who needs everyone’s support,
It is not God, who will ask everyone,
To reach him to support him,
That too, in and through one and only
Way and direction.
In and through one and only language and place.
Giving a meaning that he is a confined one.

My son,
It is such a concept of confined God
Makes you also to be intolerant and extremistic
And ask you to see God only
In certain direction and places
Through and with only certain languages.

My son,
It is just because of frustration they feel
In winning with the concept of confined God,
They happen to be intolerant and extremistic.
Or it is just because they want everyone else
To be confined like their God is
In such their concepts and beliefs.

My son,
Don’t ever try to see God,
Even if you try, you can’t see God,
As the one so much concerned of himself
As to how he is taken or believed
Or is he taken as one or many
Or whether he is approached
Directly or indirectly.

My son,
Any one with frustration is a devil.

Even if he is God,
In frustration (relatively),
He is a devil.

So, is such a God becoming
Intolerant and extremistic an entity.
Negatively relative and relatively negative
Giving and giving revelations of
Negative messages.

My son,
Relatively negative side or aspect of God is
What a devil is.

My son,
Any God that preaches intolerance and extremism
Is Devil only,
But viewed, by those, as God.

The inspiration they get is thereby
The inspiration of negative God, Devil.

My son,
Defined and confined means relative.
So, the devil.
With faces and directions.

My son,
Undefined and unconfined is absolute,

So God.

Neither seen only as only one or only many.

One and many in the meantime.

Neither in one nor in many.

Neither defined nor confined by numbers.

And no one other than him to number him.

So, my son,
Without faces and directions
But with all the faces and directions.

All faces and forms are his
Whereas no particular face or form only is his.

My son,
When God is confined into
One religion and one language,
Defined only as this and that,
Insisting that, through no other language
Can he be addressed,
And through no other direction
Can he be accessed,
Such a God becomes a confined one, devil.

My son,
Anyone confined and narrowed is a devil,
At least in effect,
Though God (in absolute) do not make any change in himself.

My son,
That is the reason, in effect and result,
Any one happening to mistake and thereby believe
In such a confined and defined God,
(Insisting to be true in only one language and religion)
Is also becoming extremistic and intolerant.

And any one with frustration (devilish/negative) will easily tend to be
Extremistic and intolerant, without help.
****************

Gayatri Mantra --- A real seed and plant of a real prayer

Gayatri Mantra.....
A real seed and plant of a real prayer
In one form.

Gayatri Mantra.....
A real prayer,
That can ever be a prayer at all,
In the least and the most.

Gayatri Mantra......
A real prayer
Both in the form of a seed and a plant

Gayatri Mantra........
A real prayer
Both In the form of the leaves and the flowers

Gayatri Mantra.......
A real prayer
Both in the form of the trunk and the branches

Gayatri Mantra.......
A prayer
Both in the form of the root and the fruit

Gayatri Mantra.......
A prayer
Both in the form of the bottom and the top

Gayatri Mantra........
In the meantime, no need for me to say or to describe
It as the only original prayer
That can really originate from
The soul and its real seeking of its nest.

Because….
Truth seeks no certification from any.

Gayatri Mantra.......
That much true it is
And the cause it is standing for.

Gayatri Mantra.......
The one and only ever green prayer
That shows the real thirst and dance of soul.

Gayatri Mantra.......
The real drops of melting soul
That really shows how cycles can repeat
To make the real seeking possibly happen
Like breathing is for the body
So as to make the whole universe, thereby, possible.

Gayatri Mantra.......
The real vapors of boiling soul
That really stands for the real seeking
Like breathing is for the body
To cause the real clouds of rain up
To cause the pouring of real rain of consolation down.


Gayatri Mantra..........
A true prayer
A true inhaling and exhaling
For true and ever unavoidable true cause
To seek and meet life,
The right path and the absolute.

Gayatri Mantra..........
The only prayer
That can ever originate really from the soul.
Like Ganges from Himalayas

Gayatri Mantra............
Areal prayer flowing through the soul.
Like blood is through the body.

Gayatri Mantra...........
A simple real prayer of all time
Making no difference between times and eras.

It is true. When devil is on leave , the merciful will be on charge.

Yes my son,
It is true.
When devil is on (or takes) leave
Raheem, the merciful
Will be on charge.

It is the (relative) mercy part of God (absolute)
To work as eraser of
What all evils (relative) the devils (relative) do.

Even otherwise, my son,
Devil is not permanent and absolute an entity.
Devil is not the one
Who was, is and will be here originally.
Devil was, is and will not be an opposite of God.
Devil is relative and temporary.
Bound to be on leave one or other day,
Giving charge to Raheem, the merciful,
To wipe and clean the dirt he has caused.
Devil is one of the many known relative qualities of
God of no qualities in absolute.

Devil is only God’s own changing (relatively),
For the reasons (relative).
The reasons, well-known and well taught,
For making, and becoming of, devil
Is nothing
But the ignorance,
Denial of real knowledge based on ignorance,
Arrogance based on such denial and ignorance
And adamancy considering ignorance
Is superior to the real knowledge,
The enlightenment..

God is original, absolute and permanent.
And such absolute God and knowledge of the absolute
Is the absolute truth.
God may give form to the devil and his evil
By way of temporary (relative) change/evolution.

My son,
If soil is considered as absolute, for example,
The fruits and flowers, ripe enough,
Are the (relative) mercy and good part/aspect
Of and from the absolute (soil).
These good fruits and flowers are,
What we call, in our day to day life,
The (relative) truth/messages of and from the absolute.

Know, my son,
The fruits and flowers can be
In any numbers,
With difference in forms, shapes, colors and tastes
From the same absolute soil.

The same soil can also bring out
The thorns and fruits that are not sweet/good for you (relative).
And the same good and ripe fruits or flowers
Can be spoiled by the passage of time.

Such thorns (relatively to us) and spoiled fruits and flowers
(Relatively, only to you) are the (relative) evil and devil part/aspect of absolute soil.
Those thorns (relatively to us) and such spoiled fruits and flowers,
What we call, in our day to day life,
Are evil/devil (relative) or evil messages from the same absolute (be it soil or God).

Milk that is good now, relatively
Can be bad/split later, relatively.
In both, absolute God of no good and bad
Is equally present.

The same rain,
Can be good for you,
But bad for a farmer,
Especially if it is untimely.

Evil and good in the same thing
In the same God.

ISLAM A RELIGION OF FAILED GOD - IT IS IMPOSSIBLY VERY UGLY TO HAVE, OR TO THINK OF, A GOD...

ISLAM A RELIGION OF FAILED GOD -

IT IS IMPOSSIBLY VERY UGLY TO HAVE, OR TO THINK OF, A GOD ....

Do stay in God
Without any one in between.

Not even a word

Not even a particular name to God.

True to say,
No one and nothing can be in between.
Except you.

Seed will
Directly communicate
With soil, air and water.

No one can be
More softer to share with
And more broader
To accommodated you safe
Than God.

God is so soft a pillow yours,
Simple and all encompassing.

In every one he stays,
And in him stays everyone.

No one can be below him,
And no one can be beyond him.

No one can be more-knowing him,
And no one can be less-knowing him.

Still,
To say God (Allah) needs some others’ support
To interpret or market him and his words is
Equal to belittling God (Allah).

It could be okay to say so of God,
If one is able to consider and say
God is in everyone and everywhere
And every one and everything is
The reflections, words and books of God.

So, a concept of God
Doing and undoing God,
In both real and unreal,
At both ends, as the end and means,
As both the lion and goat,
As both exposed and unexposed in equal terms,
As both exposing and not exposing in equal terms,
As the pronouncer, pronounced and the interpreter,
In the form of God, universe
And incarnation or interpreter.

To mean

Nothing and no one is without him.
And everything and everyone is within him.

*********** *********

It is impossibly very ugly to have, or to think of, a God
As the one who is unable to accommodate all equally
Or as the one who always is at failure/defeat end
To reach and accommodate all.

Also it is also impossibly very ugly to have, or to think of, a God
As the one eagerly wanting to get him marketed,
Making many attractive offers and schemes,
Through many of his agents, than him,
And to show his wrath and discrimination
When get failed or defeated
In such all his marketing efforts.

For sure,
If God should,
He shows all his wrath and discrimination
To him/God only.
As he is at both ends….

It is very impossibly ugly to have, or to think of, a God
Who can’t be equally understood and accessed by all,
And who is eagerly waiting, under immense pressure,
To punish those who can’t understand and access him.

My God is my soul and being
And my soul and being is my God.

Never imagine of a situation
You not accommodating your soul and being
And your soul and being not accommodating you

***************** ***************

Islam, as propagated in the name of
Present day available Islam, Mohammed and Quran,
Presents a God of this level, at failure,
With all his effort to market
With great many schemes and offers
And threatening with much greater punishments.

So is Islam, as a religion of a failed God,
Or depicted as failed God,
Becoming so intolerant.
Like any defeated one.

Any one failed and frustrated

Easily tends to be

Intolerant and extremistic

And, thereby, this type of Islam can’t agree,
And can’t go along, with
The other view of all-equally-accommodating God.

Rather, this present day Islam and its followers, Muslims,
Would hate any one to death, if he ever attempts to say
God is equally there in every one
And every one is equally there in God
And God is, for no doubt, at both ends,
As he is the end and means.

Just for the fear of loss of political or social or communal hold.
Just because of its own identity crisis.

This is not only the case of Islam
But is of almost all the Semitic religions.

************

To say God cannot talk in the way man can understand
And, again to say that,
All of us have to look towards one and the same direction
And have to pray in one and only language,
With one and only content of the prayer,
Is a big allegation against and is a belittling of God?

And to say that the interpreters can
Talk and explain better than God
Is again another big allegation against and is a belittling of God.

In this way, they do mean to say that,
These interpreters are super Gods to God,
And unless they come with their support to God,
God, by himself, will be a failure,

To give this meaning, they openly tend to say that
Without their interference and interpretation
God and his words
Can’t be understood and accessed.

What helplessness to their God!!!
Purely a weak alien God.

Especially when they happen to define God

As saperate from his creation.

**************

Meantime, their faith will advocate to them that
It is the same God
Who designed and created humans and human mindset.
But, what to say,
The same God can’t come up with a book of words
(Or with enough numbers of books
Of his words in enough numbers of languages)
That is easily digestible and understandable
To his own creation and its mindset designed by him
Is a big allegation against and is a belittling of God.

**************

To think otherwise is far better.
Everything godly.
In everything and everyone, God.
Nothing without God.
All equally God and God’s.

No words other than that of God.
Nothing other than God and God’s.
Be it tough or easy.
All just one and from one.
Many but one.
One but many.
Just the difference between reality and illusion.
Reality is one (God);
Whereas illusion (us) can be many
About and from the same one.

********* ********

Mohammed did not do or claim any magic.
It is only his followers who wanted (for him) to claim magic
On him and on Quran.

Neither with his words nor with Quranic words
He did any magic in Mekkah.

Quran and Islam were not in his mind and plan.
And both came in to be
After he got to be successful, eventually,
Especially with politics, by mistake or accident.

He was a natural mystic, and further made to be a mystic,
By the circumstance that was around him
Alienating him from social fabric.

Any mystic can be deviating as well, this way,
After he happened to be once a mystic,
If he ever happens afterwards to be,
By compulsions or impulses,
After material glory and path,
For whatever reason or with whatever reason.

And this deviation has not to be attributed to his
Gain and achievement due to such mystic nature.

It is not a must, and it is rarest of rare,
A mystic to be successful materially
In material glory and gain,
Unless he deviates or is misled by himself
By compulsions or impulses.

To be a mystic or spiritual
Do not mean anything else
Than one’s becoming true to himself
And becoming face to face,
Or becoming one (in unison),
With him, truth and God.

Getting lost of a gap/layer
Between the world inner and outer

Seed’s losing of seed nature
To sprout and grow to be a plant/tree

******* ********

Walking with Mohammed, it is easier to understand.
Initially he was nowhere,
At least, up to 53 of his age, materially speaking,
And for more than 13 years
After his so-claimed prophet-hood.

After 13 years of his said to be prophet-hood,
There, he happened to be involved in some politics.
The circumstances and its pressure,
Made him to involve in such politics,
By which we happen, or are made, to see
What we see as present day Islam and Qur’an.

He happened to be involved in some politics initially.
That too after 53 of his age,
And after he escaped to Medina.
And, thereafter, the same politics
And the power availed through that politics
Made him, the present day Islam and Quran
As we see them today.

That is why, materially he was a big failure during his life,
At least till he completed his 53 in Makkah.
Be it is with his own words or words of Quran.
He got very few friends there,
Because of more of his mystic way of living.

He was nowhere in social spectrum.
The history, we hear and read now,
Is the history written,
After he (and so-called Islam) actually happened to be successful,
Under political supervision.
Not written, walking with him in his life.

******* *******

In his 25, if he was, some how forced, to marry
45 year old lady of many children,
What will it mean?
That too in such an old Arab time.
At least, see the fact that
He had to wait for his own marriage
Up to 25 years of his age during that old time.

It was not only because of his self alienating mystic nature
But also because of the alienation
He had to face from the society for many reasons.
No one can even claim
He was ever proposed to any other virgin
Before his first marriage in his 25, to 45 year old women
Of many children (20 years older than him).

He did not enjoy good status and respect
From the society of his time.
Not because of his personal faults.
But, mainly because of his own poor orphan nature and upbringing.
No magic and no attributed beauty and romantics in it.

When he was 25, at the age of marriage,
He was not a prophet too.
But after 40, till 53, in Mekkah,
With his first marriage, to a women 20 years older than him,
He was a prophet, as said to be.

He managed his life,
Or he could some how manage his life
And material sustenance,
With the support, care and money power
Of his first old wife.
This might have alienated him again
From the social fabric of male supremacy,
Which, as a result, might have strengthened his alienation
To make him to be more mystic and meditating,
Leading him to be alone in the cave Hira,
Away from all kinds of social interactions,
As the history says.

And materially, he could revenge this past history,
If he felt, he was denied,
Celebrating many marriages, later on,
After his first old wife’s death,
After he was almost 52 or 53
And when he could escape from Mekkah.

His all other marriage (numbering to total of 12)
Took place after the death of his first old wife
And after he has escaped to Medina
And could find some success,
Eventually, accidentally, as a politician or organizer in Medina
Deviating little away from his original mystic nature.

Only after going to Medina,
Or after politicizing and resorting to war and fight,
Against his own mystic nature of earlier life,
He became successful as we know of him today.
But that was not because of the magic of his or Quran’s words.
There worked a good organizer and politician in him, by chance.

Quran became Quran of today
And Islam became Islam of today
Because of power and politics,
That came together with and afterwards.
That too after nearly 10 to 15 years of Mohammed’s death.

With the power in hand,
Quiet simply and logically,
Other facts and versions could be suppressed.
Easily becoming intolerant with and for the slogan and faith of
Mohammed is the last prophet and Quran is the last book.
To the extend that they could kill and suppress any one
With any kind of difference of opinion or different version
Or any one who claimed to be saying his own truth
Or claimed to be another prophet after Mohammed.

(For the reason of its stand,
Islam is the only path, Quran is the only Book
And Muhammed is the only prophet to be followed)

If Mohammed was to be successful because of the Quran and its divine force,
He should have been successful in Makkah itself
And he should not have to migrate/escape to Madina.

It is a big limitation on Quran that
It could not address the major share
(More than 90%) of the people of the world of that time, and till now,
Even when it claims to be the last book from God.

It is a big limitation on Mohammed,
As the claimed to be last prophet, that
He could not address the major share
(More than 90%) of the people of the world of that time, till now,
Before his death, even when he is claimed to be
The last prophet and Qur’an is the last book from God.

Better would be to say that
God has no last and first.
God never puts a full stop,
Not even a comma.

God is in continuity and flow.

*****************

This claim of last prophet and last book is
That which makes all Muslims to be
Equally extremis-tic and intolerant.

They are bound to believe that
No one else can talk truth after Mohamed and Quran.

If at all any one needs to talk anything,
That should be in the way of
Following and interpreting Muhammed and Quran
(Some how belittling both Quran and Mohammed)

God we know,
In whom we live and die,
Neither makes any full stop
Nor even any comma….

He is ever talking
Through all the tongues

Or he is never talking
With any tongue.

****** *******

Seed will grow
To be a tree
In the same soil
Sucking the same water
Spreading to the same air.

To make the soil, water, air and seed
One and the same
And to mean seed is nothing
But soil, water and air.

Helplessness is my helpfulness

Mustard seed and
Mountain of Himalaya.
No difference.

*************


My lord,
Your magic is the real magic
That makes me do magic.

Giving me a feel
Of me doing and making
You made me do and make.

Changing me to be
A God or a goddess or an angel
I happen to do and make,
And made and created all
I have created for me and my world
With the feel of me doing and making.

But it was your design and creation
Happening through me and my world,
Our minds and hands.

**************
My lord,
The instilled feel of
“Me” “for me” and “mine”,
Made me to be busy
To sustain and maintain
All those happened to be
Made and done through me.

And, again, it made me to be busy
To earn or learn the lessons of
Sustaining and maintaining
The world of own creation.

**************

My lord
Nothing to explain
And no way I can explain.

You are never less in knowing.

Eyes and heart.
How small are they?

Brain and brilliancy.
I am unable to know
How they function
To enable an understanding
Of me and you.

Ignorance is my knowledge
About you and me.

Inability is my ability
That enables my existence

Helplessness,
Before me and you.
Is my helpfulness
That supports me to remain.

**************

Mustard seed and
Mountain of Himalaya.

No difference.