The first act of an uninformed people is: hero worship, idolization, deification (turning people into avatars/incarnations), divinization…
That is how everything they saw, heard, or that died in battle became idols, avatars, heroes, and divine beings.
The main characteristic of a country with uninformed people is: that lazy and hypocritical priests, temple custodians (“thantris”), gurus, and ascetics — whose only path in life is exploitation — flourish like mushrooms, like mosquitoes, flies, and termites…
What has happened overall in India, and what Indians as a whole have done, is exactly this: hero worship, idolization, avatar-making, divinization.
Alongside this, it has freely happened that lazy and hypocritical priests, thantris, gurus, and ascetics who drain and exhaust the people around them have flourished.
Even now, what India and Indians as a whole are bringing about and doing is this same hero worship, idolization, avatar-making, divinization.
Even a person who was good for nothing, inflated like a balloon by various people until he became Prime Minister, went so far as to claim: that he was not a physical birth, but a direct birth of the Supreme Soul.
That is the extent to which anyone can deceive anyone else here.
Nurturing and sustaining lazy and hypocritical priests, thantris, gurus, and ascetics is what India and Indians have mainly done throughout history, and continue to do even now.
Islam entirely rejects, denies, and prohibits this hero worship, idolization, avatar-making, and divinization.
Islam firmly denies and does away with lazy and hypocritical priests, thantris, gurus, and ascetics.
Islam insists firmly that human beings need no intermediary, no go-between, no thantri, no priest, no rituals, offerings, prayers, or donation boxes to connect with the One God who is the very consciousness of the universe.
Islam does not accept or consider that Jesus, Krishna, Muhammad, or anyone else is the son of God, or an avatar, or a special franchise or agency of God.
In Islamic terms, God does not take avatars/incarnations, and no one is an incarnation of God.
In Islamic terms, God remains only as God.
Jesus, Krishna, Muhammad, and no one else are anything other than ordinary human beings — mere creations of God, nothing more, no one more.
In Islamic terms, everyone is merely a creation, merely a human being.
As for Krishna, there remains, in every sense, a valid basis for doubt as to whether such a person historically existed, whether he was human, or whether he was a product of human imagination.
The God of Islam is One.
The God of Islam was neither born nor gave birth.
The God of Islam is father to no one.
The God of Islam is the son of no one.
The God that Islam presents is one that admits no equal and no comparison.
The God that Islam presents does not fit within the scale of creation or within the measuring standards and analogies given to creation.
Muhammad’s father was not a Muslim.
There will not be a single Muslim in the world who does not accept that Muhammad’s father was not a Muslim.
But in Krishna’s case, it wasn’t about the father.
It was said — without a shred of doubt — that Krishna himself did not know of a religion called Hinduism, that Krishna himself never spoke of a religion called Hinduism, that Krishna himself did not know that he was a Hindu, and that Krishna himself was not a Hindu.
This is mere empty talk with no evidence or record.
Empty talk about “Sanatana Dharma.”
Anyone can make such a claim.
Anyone can claim “Sanatana Dharma” about whatever belongs to them.
Even those who have nothing particular to say can claim Sanatana Dharma.
Not a single scripture can be shown to have explicitly named, defined, or introduced itself as “Sanatana Dharma.”
Neither Krishna nor Rama ever spoke of or knew the term “Sanatana Dharma.”
So then, on what model or guideline is this claim of Sanatana Dharma being scattered around like dust in the wind?

.jpg)