Thursday, November 5, 2026

Groups formed by differences of opinion are not castes. BJP, Marxists and Congress are not different castes.

Groups formed by differences of opinion are not castes.

The BJP, the Marxists and the Congress are not different castes.


Groups formed by differences of opinion are not a permanent label acquired by birth, as caste is.


Groups formed by differences of opinion can be chosen.


The sects within Islam and among Muslims are merely groups formed by differences of opinion, just like the BJP, the Congress and so on: changeable in any direction, and chosen.


Even if it is true, as someone claims, that castes exist among Muslims in North India, that is a story of ignorance in North India. It is not the story of Islam or of Muslims.


All that is only the result of ignorance in India, and of the Indian caste system simply being carried over.


What this writer said, very clearly, is that there is no caste or casteism in Islam, and none among Muslims who believe in and follow Islam.


In any case, the fact that there is no caste or casteism in Islam or among Muslims is something that anyone clearly knows, or can know.


Note that what was said was "among Muslims in India."


In India...


In a land full of filth, that filth will creep into everyone who lives there unless they stay vigilant.


It is just like the fish smell that clings to someone who has been to a fish market. It is the influence of one's surroundings.


This writer too said that the filth of pride in birth and lineage, and of high-and-low hierarchy, which crept in that way, does exist among Indian Muslims.


But those filthy practices of hierarchy and casteism are not in the articles of faith of Islam, and do not belong to it.


The Hindu belief in sins and merits of a previous birth:


The belief that each person's birth is determined by the sins and merits of their previous birth.


The belief that each person's birth is merely a rebirth that results from the sins and merits of a previous life (a belief said to be that of Hinduism).


This created the filth of hierarchical casteism among Hindus in India. It also made people feel no pang of conscience at all in enforcing that hierarchical casteism.


Islam, which does not contribute such a belief in birth based on previous-life sins, merits and rebirth, did not produce such hierarchy among Muslims.


Instead, Islam established only that all human beings are equal, alike before one single God.


That is, among Muslims who are Muslims because they believe in and follow Islam, there is no caste that becomes a stamp by birth, and no casteist hierarchy, in their lives or in their world, and there will not be.


If the governments of India determine that there are castes among Indian Muslims, will there then be caste in Islam? Can it be said that Islam has a caste system?


Isn't the basis of Islam only Islam itself, that is, the Quran and the example set by Prophet Muhammad?


The basis of Islam is not the Indian government and government records, is it?


The castes among Muslims determined by the government are not castes that Islam permits or prescribes.


Islamically, there is only one human being, one earth, one God and one system.

Wednesday, November 4, 2026

അഭിപ്രായ വ്യത്യാസങ്ങൾ മൂലമുള്ള വിഭാഗങ്ങൾ ജാതികളല്ല. ജന്മം കൊണ്ട് ചാപ്പയാവുന്നതല്ല.

അഭിപ്രായ വ്യത്യാസങ്ങൾ മൂലമുള്ള വിഭാഗങ്ങൾ ജാതികളല്ല. 


ബിജെപിയും മാർക്സിസ്റ്റും കോൺഗ്രസ്സും വ്യത്യസ്ത ജാതികൾ അല്ല. 


അഭിപ്രായ വ്യത്യാസങ്ങൾ മൂലമുള്ള വിഭാഗങ്ങൾ ജാതി പോലെ ജന്മം കൊണ്ട് കിട്ടുന്ന സ്ഥിരം ചാപ്പയല്ല. 


അഭിപ്രായ വ്യത്യാസങ്ങൾ മൂലമുള്ള വിഭാഗങ്ങൾ തെരഞ്ഞെടുക്കാവുന്നതാണ്.


ഇസ്ലാമിലെയും മുസ്ലിംകൾക്കിടയിലേയും വിഭാഗങ്ങൾ അഭിപ്രായവ്യത്യാസങ്ങൾ  മൂലമുള്ള വിഭാഗങ്ങൾ  മാത്രം.  ബിജെപിയും കോൺഗ്രസ്സും ഒക്കെ പോലെ. എങ്ങോട്ടും മാറാവുന്നത്,  തെരഞ്ഞെടുക്കാവുന്നത്.


*******


ഉത്തരേന്ത്യയിൽ മുസ്ലിംകൾക്കിടയിൽ ജാതികൾ ഉണ്ടെന്ന് ആരെങ്കിലും പറയുന്നത് ശരിയെന്ന് വെച്ചാൽ  തന്നെയും അത് ഉത്തരേന്ത്യയിലെ വിവരക്കേടിന്റെ കഥയാണ്. ഇസ്ലാമിന്റെയും മുസ്ലിംകളുടെയും കഥയല്ല.


അതൊക്കെ ഇന്ത്യയിൽ വിവരക്കേട് മൂലമുണ്ടായതും ഇന്ത്യൻ ജാതിസമ്പ്രദായം അപ്പടി കടന്നുവന്നതും മാത്രം.


ഇസ്ലാമിൽ ജാതിയും ജാതീയതയും ഇല്ല, ഇസ്ലാം വിശ്വസിച്ച്  പിന്തുടരുന്ന  മുസ്ലിംകളിലും ജാതിയും ജാതീയതയും ഇല്ല എന്നാണ് ഈയുള്ളവൻ കൃത്യമായും പറഞ്ഞത്.


ഏത് നിലക്കും ഇസ്ലാമിലും  മുസ്ലിംകളിലും  ജാതിയും ജാതീയതയും  ഇല്ല എന്നത് ആർക്കും വ്യക്തമായി അറിയുന്ന,  അറിയാവുന്ന കാര്യമാണ്.


*******


ഇന്ത്യയിൽ മുസ്ലിംകളുടെ ഇടയിൽ എന്ന് പറഞ്ഞത് തന്നെ ശ്രദ്ധിക്കുക.


ഇന്ത്യയിൽ… 


വൃത്തികേട് നിറഞ്ഞ നാട്ടിൽ അവിടെയുള്ളവരിൽ ഒക്കെയും അവർ ജാഗരൂകരല്ലെങ്കിൽ ആ വൃത്തികേട് കയറിവരും. 


മീൻ മാർക്കറ്റിൽ പോയവനിൽ മീൻ മാണം കയറിവരുന്നത് പോലെ തന്നെ. ചുറ്റുപാട് ഉണ്ടാക്കുന്ന സ്വാധീനം 


അങ്ങനെ കയറിവന്ന ജന്മ-കുല പെരുമയുടെയും ഉച്ചനീചത്വത്തിന്റെയും വൃത്തികേടുകൾ ഇന്ത്യൻമുസ്ലിംകളിൽ ഉണ്ട് എന്നുതന്നെയാണ് ഈയുള്ളവനും പറഞ്ഞത്. 


പക്ഷേ ആ ഉച്ചനീചത്വ ജാതീയ വൃത്തികേടുകൾ ഇസ്ലാമിന്റെ വിശ്വാസപ്രമാണങ്ങളിൽ ഇല്ല, ഉള്ളതല്ല.


ഹൈന്ദവതയിലെ മുജ്ജന്മ പാപ-പുണ്യ വിശ്വാസം.


മുജ്ജന്മ പാപ-പുണ്യത്തിന്റെ  അടിസ്ഥാനത്തിലാണ് ഓരോരുത്തന്റെയും ഓരോ ജന്മമെന്ന വിശ്വാസം.


ഓരോരുത്തന്റെയും ജന്മം മുജ്ജന്മ പാപ-പുണ്യങ്ങളുടെ ഫലമായി മാത്രമുണ്ടാവുന്ന പുനർജന്മം മാത്രമാണെന്ന വിശ്വാസം (ഹിന്ദുമതത്തിന്റേത് എന്ന് പറയപ്പെടുന്ന വിശ്വാസം).


ഇത് ഇന്ത്യയിലെ ഹിന്ദുക്കകളിൽ  ഉച്ചനീചത്വ ജാതീയ വൃത്തികേടുകൾ ഉണ്ടാക്കി. ഉച്ചനീചത്വ ജാതീയ വൃത്തികേടുകൾ നടപ്പാക്കുന്നതിൽ ഒരുതരം വേദനും ഉളവാക്കാതാക്കി.


 അങ്ങനെയുള്ള ജന്മം മുജ്ജന്മ പാപ-പുണ്യ പുനർജന്മ വിശ്വാസം സംഭാവന  ചെയ്യാത്ത ഇസ്ലാം മുസ്ലിംകളിൽ അതുവെച്ചുള്ള ഉച്ചനീചത്വം ഉണ്ടാക്കിയില്ല. 


പകരം ഇസ്ലാം മനുഷ്യരെല്ലാവരും ഒരുപോലെ ഒന്ന്, ഒരൊറ്റ ദൈവത്തിന് മുൻപിൽ ഒന്നുപോലെ എന്നും മാത്രം വരുത്തി.


എന്നുവെച്ചാൽ ഇസ്ലാം വിശ്വസിച്ച്  പിന്തുടരുന്നത് കൊണ്ട് മുസ്ലിംകളായ മുസ്ലിംകളുടെ ജീവിതത്തിലും ലോകത്തും ജന്മം കൊണ്ട് ചാപ്പയാവുന്ന ജാതിയും ജാതീയ ഉച്ചനീചത്വവും ഇല്ല, ഉണ്ടാവില്ല എന്നർത്ഥം.


********


ഇന്ത്യയിലെ സർക്കാറുകൾ ഇന്ത്യൻ മുസ്ലിംകളിൽ ജാതികൾ ഉണ്ടെന്ന് നിശ്ചയിച്ചാൽ ഇസ്ലാമിൽ ജാതി ഉണ്ടാവുമോ, ഇസ്ലാമിൽ ജാതിസമ്പ്രദായം ഉണ്ടെന്ന് പറയാനാവുമോ? 


ഇസ്ലാമിന് അടിസ്ഥാനം ഇസ്ലാം മാത്രമല്ലേ, മുഹമ്മദ് ഖുർആനും ഒപ്പം മുഹമ്മദ് നബി കാണിച്ച മാതൃകയും മാത്രമല്ലേ?


ഇസ്ലാമിന് അടിസ്ഥാനം ഇന്ത്യൻ സർക്കാരും  സർക്കാർ രേഖകളും അല്ലല്ലോ?


സർക്കാർ നിശ്ചയിച്ച മുസ്ലിംകളിലെ ജാതികൾ ഇസ്ലാം അനുവദിക്കുന്ന, നിദ്ദേശിക്കുന്ന ജാതികൾ അല്ല.


ഇസ്ലാമികമായി ഒരൊറ്റ മനുഷ്യനും ഒരൊറ്റ ഭൂമിയും ഒരൊറ്റ ദൈവവും ഒരൊറ്റ വ്യവസ്ഥിതിയും മാത്രമേ ഉള്ളൂ.


Sunday, November 1, 2026

Shamelessness: What Piyush Goyal said in the Netherlands.

Haven't you seen and heard the RSS/BJP slave mentality?


Haven't you seen and heard the RSS/BJP mindset that treats Indians as slaves?


Haven't you seen and heard the RSS/BJP mindset that is ready to hand over Indians as slaves?


Haven't you seen and heard the RSS/BJP mindset that is ready to offer Indians as slaves?


Just one example.


The shamelessness of RSS/BJP minister Piyush Goyal alone is enough to see and hear it.


What Piyush Goyal said in the Netherlands this week (on 27 October 2026) is enough:


"Go ahead and make Indian workers work after five in the evening, even beyond working hours, and make them work on holidays too. Indians won't say anything, they won't voice any complaint. They will obey and work without questioning."


A shameless, boot-licking slave mentality that concedes that labour laws and workers' rights do not apply to Indians.


A shameless, boot-licking slave mentality that concedes that Indians do not need, and are not entitled to, the rights and dignity due to human beings.


A filthy, shameless, disgraceful speech that degraded India to the extreme and laid bare a slave consciousness.


This is the audacity the BJP draws on to commit any outrage and to deceive people by telling them anything. It comes from the belief that Indians, apart from a few upper castes, are fools.


The assumption is that Indians, who have historically carried a slave mentality because of casteism, will go on carrying that same mentality, and that whatever they have to endure, they will not react.


A shameless speech that gives permission to exploit Indians in any way possible.

Quran: What suits its context becomes unsuitable once it is pulled out of that context

Raw fish is one thing. Fish in a curry, simmered down with good raw mango, tomato, coconut, turmeric, and salt, is another.

Seeing, displaying, and circulating something pulled out of the Quran, torn from its context, is one thing. The Quran, and what it says in its proper context, is another.


One who doesn't eat raw fish raw, who sees it as foul-smelling and unclean, will happily enjoy the fish in the curry, and will enthusiastically arrange it beautifully on the dining table.


That is how the Quran is, and the verses read from within the Quran itself.


Pulled out of context, even good food becomes like something placed in a toilet bowl. It becomes inedible. You wouldn't feel like going near it.


It is like the life-blood that should be flowing in the body, the blood that runs as life itself. If it comes outside the body, out of its context, it becomes something filthy and frightening.


In the same way, fascist occupying forces, driven by their vested malicious interests, pull things out of the Quran and merely parade them in public.


Every verse is the life-blood flowing through the veins of the living Quran.


In its completeness within the body that is the Quran, it is precise, clear, contextual, enduring across the ages, and guiding human life in every dimension.


What would it look like if each organ were removed from the body and displayed separately?


That is exactly what those do who, intending to mislead people about the Quran, pull things out and quote them here and there.


What suits its context becomes unsuitable once it is pulled out of that context and placed outside the body.


What comes from the Quran is like life-blood, which can be made to look filthy when shown outside the body.


Just as what is in the stomach is filthy and foul-smelling once it reaches outside the stomach.


What is in the stomach is not meant to come into the mouth.


What has gone from the mouth to the inside is not the same as what was before it went in, if it comes back out.


When that happens, what belongs on the dining table ends up as if placed in a toilet bowl, and what belongs in a septic tank ends up on your dining table.


The Quran's instructions for a wartime atmosphere are not instructions for peacetime, for ordinary life.


This is true not just of the Quran, but in any country and anywhere in the world.


Instructions given to soldiers in wartime do not apply to ordinary people in ordinary life.


So it should be understood that the Quran is a book that deals with war and peace, politics, economics, society, family, and more.


Because it is a living book, the Quran pervades all of life, engages with it, and serves to intervene and respond.


Whoever reads the Quran in full will find nothing out of place or incongruous, nothing but a comprehensive and beautiful whole.


Raw fish is one thing. Fish in a curry made with good mango, tomato, coconut, turmeric, and salt is another.